Main Article Content
The news about the number of arrests conducted by the Corruption Eradication Commission is one proof of the high level of corruption in Indonesia. The fact that there are still many cases of fraud or fraud that cannot be detected due to the lack of effectiveness of auditors in carrying out audit procedures. This study was conducted to try to determine the effect of task complexity, the role of the Whistleblower and the ability of investigative auditors to the effectiveness of implementing audit procedures in proving fraud. This research will be conducted using a survey conducted with a questionnaire instrument that is first tested for its validity and reliability. The population in this study were investigative auditors at the Lampung Provincial Audit Board (BPK) and the Lampung Province Audit Board of Finance and Development (BPKP), with a sample of investigative auditors or auditors who were and were able to conduct investigative audits. The update of this study is that in this study the authors used other variables that influenced the effectiveness of the audit procedures in the proof of fraud which were still rarely examined in previous studies, namely the variable task complexity, and the role variable whistleblower. Another difference in research is the population used in research.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
Arens, Marks S.Beasley, dan Randal J.Elders. 2008. Auditing dan Jasa Assurance, Pendekatan Terintegrasi. Jakarta:Erlangga.
Arles, Leardo. 2014. Faktor – Faktor Pendorong Terjadinya Fraud: Predator vs. Accidental Fraudster Diamond theory Refleksi Teori Fraud Triangle (Klasik) Suatu Kajian Teoritis. Papper Ilmiah. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Riau.
Bologna, J., & Lindquist, R. J. (2013). Fraud auditing and forensic accounting: new tools and techniques. Universitas Michigan: Wiley.
Bonner, S.E. 1994. “ A Model of The Effects of Audit Taxk Complexity. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19 (3), 213-234.
Cahyaningrum, Christina Dwi dan Utami Intiyas. 2015. Do Obedience Pressure and Task Complexity Affect Audit Desecion?. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, Juni 2015, Vol. 12, No. 1, hal 92 – 105.
Cahyono, Wijaya dan Domai. 2015. Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, Objektifitas, Kompleksitas Tugas, Dan Integritas Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit. ISSN: 2407-6864, E-JurnalUniversitasBrawijaya, Vol. 5, No.1, 2015.
Chung, J. dan G. S. Monroe. 2001. A Research Note on the Effects of Gender and Task Complexity on an Audit Judgment. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 13 (1), 111-125.
Crowe, H. (2011). “Why The Fraud Triangle Is No Longer Enough”. In Horwath, Crowe LLP.
Fachrunisa, Aisah. 2015. Pengaruh Keefektifan Pengendalian Internal, Keadilan Distributif, Keadilan Prosedural dan Budaya Etis Organisasi terhadap kecenderungan Kecurangan (fraud) Akuntansi”. Jom FEKON Vol. 2 No. 2.
Mamahit, Atrisia Inayati dan Urumsah Dekar, 2018. The Comprehensive Model of Whistle-blowing, Forensic Audit, Audit Investigation, and Fraud Detection”. Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance Vol.1 No.02 November 2018, pp. 153-162.
Pamungkas, Imang Dapit, Imam Ghozali dan Tarmizi Achmad. 2017. The Effects of the Whistleblowing System on Financial Statements Fraud: Ethical Behavior as The Mediators”. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology IJCIET). Volume 8, Issue 10, October 2017.
Putra, Armando Mega, Lestira Magnaz O., dan Maemunah Mey. 2017. Pengaruh Audit Investigasi dan Efektivitas Whistleblowing System terhadap Pencegahan Kecurangan (Fraud), (Survei pada Perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara di Kota Bandung). Prosiding Akuntansi ISSN: 2460-6561, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Islam Bandung.
Rahmayani, L., Kamaliah dan Susilatri. 2016. Pengaruh Kemampuan Auditor, Skeptisme Profesionalisme Auditor, Teknik Audit Dan Whistleblower Terhadap Efektifitas Pelaksanaan Audit Investigasi Dalam Pengungkapan Kecurangan. JOM FEKON, Vol. 1, No. 2 Oktober 2014.
Tuannakota, Theodorus M. (2010). Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif, Edisi 2. Jakarta Salemba Empat.
Tuanakotta, Theodorus M. (2012). Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Restuningdiah, Nurika dan Nur Indriantoro. 2000. Pengaruh Partisipasi terhadap Kepuasan Pemakai dalam pengembangan Sistem Informasi dengan Kompleksitas Tugas, Kompleksitas Sistem, dan Pengaruh Pemakai sebagai Moderating Variabel”, Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia, Vol. 3, No. 2: 119-133. 2000.
Wolfe, David T., dan Dana R. Hermanson. 2004. “The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud”. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, CPA Journal 74.12 (2004): 38-42.