Main Article Content
Mining activities are one of the activities that make a positive contribution to community life. However, in addition to making a positive contribution to mining activities, it also has a negative impact on society and the environment. This study was conducted to try to determine the role of benefits, impacts and community trust in influencing community acceptance of mining operations carried out by the company. This research will be carried out using questionnaires and conducting a question and answer directly to the people who live in the area around the mine. The population of this research is the entire community living around the mining area with a sample of about 210 community respondents living around the mining area in Lampung. The renewal of this study is that this study will add diversity and sample criteria compared to previous studies, such as people who live around the mine but also work in related mining companies, environmental activists, and civil servants who work in services that benefit from mining activities. company.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
 Chen, JC, & Roberts, RW (2010). Toward a More Coherent Understanding of the Organization – Society Relationship: A Theoretical Consideration for Social and Environmental Accounting Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 651-665.
 Emerson, R., 1972. Exchange theory, partI: a psychological basis for social exchange. In: Berger, J., Zelditch Jr, M, Anderson, B (Eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
 Franks, D. M., Brereton, D., Moran, C. J.,2010. Managing the Cumulative Impacts of Coal Mining on Regional Communities and Environments in Australia. Impact Assess. Project Apprais. 284,299–312.
 Homans, G.C., 1961. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. Harcourt, Brace, & World, New York.
 Lesmana, Y., & Tarigan, J. (2014). The Effect of Sustainability Reporting on the Financial Performance of Public Companies in the Ratios Asset Management Side. Business Accounting Review, 101-110.
 Lindblom, CK (1994). The Implications of Organizational Legitimacy for Corporate Social Performance and Disclosure. Paper Presented at the Critical Perspectives at Accounting Conference, New York.
 Litmanen, T., & Litmanen, Jartti, Rantala, T. (2016). Refining the preconditions of a social license to operate (SLO): reflections on citizens' attitudes towards mining in two Finnish regions. The Extractive Industries and Society 3, 782-792.
 Moffat, K., & Zhang, A. (2014). The paths to social license to operate: An integrative model of explaining community acceptance of mining. Commonwealth ScienceOrganizationand Industry Research, 61-70.
 Owen, J. R., Kemp, D., 2012. Social Licence and Mining: A Critical Perspective. Resources Policy 38, 29–35.
 Prno, J., Slocombe, D. S., 2012. Exploring the Origins of ‘Social License to Operate’ In the Mining Sector: Perspectives From Governance and Sustainability Theories. Resource Policy 37,346–357.
 Roarty, M., 2010. The Australian Resources Sector - Its Contribution to the Nation, and a Brief Review of Issues and Impacts. Retrieved on January 20, 2015, from http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parlia mentary_Library/pubs/BN/1011/AustResources.
 Siegrist, M., Connor, M., Keller, C., 2012. Trust, Confidence, Procedural Fairness, Outcome Fairness, Moral Conviction, and the Acceptance of GM Field Experiments. Risk Anal. 32, 1394–1403.
 Suchman, MC (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review 20 (3), 571–610.
 Terwel, B. W., Harinck, F., Ellemers, N., Daamen, D. D. L., 2010. Voice in political decision-making: the effect of group voice on perceived trust worthiness of decision makers and subsequent acceptance of decisions. J. Exp. Psychol.: Appl. 16, 173–186.
 Weng, Z., Mudd, G. M., Martin, T. ,Boyles, C. A.,2012. Pollutant Loads From Coal Mining in Australia: Discerning Trends from the National Pollutant Inventory (NPI). Environ.Sci.Policy19-20,78–89.
 Zhang, A., & Moffat, K. (2015). A balancing act: The role of benefits, impacts, and confidence in governance in predicting the acceptance of mining in Australia. Resources Policy 44, 25-34.
 Zhang, A., Measham, TG, & Moffat, K. (2018). Preconditions for social license: The importance of information in the initial engagement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1559-1566.