Main Article Content
While several studies in the last decade explore the potential benefits of virtual worlds in education settings, less attention has been given to the research of solutions to help overcome implementation barriers. One of the existing areas of concern is related to the difficulties on the exploitation of data obtained from educational virtual worlds. This paper proposes an OWL-based ontology to address a solution to the problem of inconsistency of databases that record information about student interactions with learning objects within these environments. The steps that have been followed for the development of the ontology are described, guided by Stanford’s 101 model. To discuss the feasibility and exemplify the ontology, an instance of an existing virtual world interaction is presented. The conclusion is that the proposed ontology can be helpful to researchers and development groups as it delivers a reusable model to gather data in a uniform way.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
Allison, C., Miller, A., Sturgeon, T., Nicoll, J. R., & Pereira, I. (2010, October). Educationally enhanced
virtual worlds. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2010 IEEE (pp. T4F-1). IEEE.
Balderas, Antonio, et al. "Retrieving Objective Indicators from Student Logs in Virtual Worlds." Journal
of Information Technology Research (JITR) 10.3 (2017): 69-83.
Bille, W., Pellens, B., Kleinermann, F., De Troyer, O. (2004). Intelligent Modelling of Virtual Worlds
Using Domain Ontologies. IVEVA, 97.
Bernstein, P.A., Haas, L. (2008). Information integration in the enterprise. ACM 51(9), 72–79.
Bloehdorn, S., Haase, P., Huang, Z., Sure, Y., Völker, J., van Harmelen, F., Studer, R. (2009). Ontology
Management, Semantic Knwoledge Management, Springer.
D. L. McGuinness and F. van Harmelen. OWL web ontology language overview, June 2004.
DCMI, Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (2012).
De Troyer, O., Bille, W., Romero, R., & Stuer, P. (2003). On Generating Virtual Worlds from Domain
Ontologies. In MMM (pp. 279-294).
Eguchi A., Thompson, C. (2011), Towards a Sematic World: Smart Objects In A Virtual World,
International Journal of Computer Information System and Industrial Management Applications, Volume
Freitas, S., Rebolledo-Mendez, G. Liarokapis, F., Magoulas, G., Poulovassilis, A. (2010). Learning as
immersive experiences: Using the four-dimensional framework for designing and evaluating immersive
learning experiences in a virtual world. British Journal of Educational Technology. Volume 41, Issue 1,
January 2010, Pages 69–85. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5116552/
Gali, A., Chen, C. X., Claypool, K. T., & Uceda-Sosa, R. (2004, November). From ontology to relational
databases. In International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (pp. 278-289). Springer Berlin
González, M.M.A., Santos, B.S.N., Vargas, A.R., Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Orihuela, A.R. (2013). VirtualWorlds. Opportunities and Challenges in the 21st Century.2013 International Conference on Virtual and
Augmented Reality in Education, Procedia Computer Science 25 (2013) 330 – 337.
Gregory, S., Scutter, S., Jacka, S. L., McDonald, M., Farley, H. Newman, C. (2015). Barriers and
Enablers to the Use of Virtual Worlds in Higher Education: An Exploration of Educator Perceptions,
Attitudes and Experiences. Educational Technology & Society, 18 (1), 3–12.
Muñoz-Cristóbal, J. A., Prieto, L. P., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Martínez-Monés, A., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M.,
Dimitriadis, Y. (2015). Coming Down to Earth: Helping Teachers Use 3D Virtual Worlds in
Across-Spaces Learning Situations. Educational Technology Society, 18 (1), 13–26.
Noy, N., McGuinness, D. (2001). “Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First
Ontology,”. Stanford University.
Quackenbush, J. (2004). Data standards for 'omic' science. Nature Biotechnology, 22: 613–614.
Reisoğlu, I., Topu, B., Yılmaz, R., Yılmaz, T. K., & Göktaş, Y. (2017). 3D virtual learning environments
in education: a meta-review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 18(1), 81-100.
Rico, M., Martinez-Muñoz, G., Alaman, X., Camacho, D., Pulido, E. (2011), A Programming Experience
of High School Students in a Virtual World Platform. International Journal of Engineering Education Vol.
, No. 1, pp. 1–9.
Rodriguez, M.A., Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H. (2007). A Practical Ontology for the Large-Scale
Modeling of Scholarly Artifacts and their Usage. JCDL’07, June 17–22, 2007, Vancouver, British
Rudman, P., Lavelle, S.P., Salmon, G., Cashmore, A. (2010). SWIFT-ly enhancing laboratory learning:
genetics in the virtual world. ALT-C 2010 Conference Proceedings.p.118-128.
Shamdasani, J., Bloodsworth, P., Hauer, T., Branson, A. Odeh, M., McClatchey, R. (2011). A Criteria for
Selecting Background Knowledge for Domain Specific Semantic Matchin,CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
Soto, M., Allongue, S. (1997). A semantic approach of virtual worlds interoperability. In Enabling
Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, 1997. Proceedings., Sixth IEEE Workshops on
(pp. 173-178). IEEE.
Tibola, L., Voss, G., Avila, B., Tarouco, L., Sgobbi, F. (2014, October). Virtual laboratory for promoting
engagement and complex learning. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate,
Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (Vol. 2014, No. 1, pp. 1933-1938).
Thompson, C. (2011). Next-Generation Virtual Worlds: Architecture, Status, and Directions. IEEE
Internet Computing, Jan/Feb, pp.60-65.
Tudorache, T., Nyulas, C., Noy, N., Musen, M. (2011). WebProtégé: A Collaborative Ontology Editor andKnowledge Acquisition Tool for the Web, Semantic Web 11-165, IOS Press.
Yoon, T. E., George, J.F. (2013). Why aren’t organizations adopting virtual worlds? Computers in Human
Behavior, Vol. 29, Issue 3. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563212003329
Wiley, D. A. (2003). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor,
and a taxonomy. Utah State University. The Edumetrics Institute.