The Need for Context-specificity in Global Educational Policy Transfer by Non-state Actors

The Case of "Teach for All" to "Teach for India"


  • GIDEON SEUN OLANREWAJU Aid for Rural Education Access Initiative (AREAi)
  • Abiodun Yetunde Omotosho Aid for Rural Education Access Initiative (AREAi)
  • Olajide Charles Falajiki Aid for Rural Education Access Initiative (AREAi)
  • Godwin Osama Aid for Rural Education Access Initiative (AREAi)



Teach for All, Teach for India, Education, Context


The revitalised role of non-state actors such as non-profit organisations and education reform movements in educational provision and delivery has contributed to the global circulation of uninformed transnational adaptation of ideas and practices around educational change. In adapting models in one place for emulation in another place, educational non-profits often lose sight of the local realities, thereby decontextualizing cultural differences and normalizing the language of generalization. Such is the case of the Teach for India (TFI), a non-governmental organization (NGO) working in marginalized districts of India to provide quality education to disadvantaged children through its alternative teacher credentialing program. TFI’s theory of change and intervention approach revolves around the model of Teach for All (TFA), an international movement whose model and belief of equitable educational access and opportunity continues to spread on a global scale through transnational actors. Through an extensive literature review, this article analyses critically and discusses how the TFAll’s Model is operationalised in India, through TFI that was established in 2009 to promote the universalization of Elementary Education (UEE) in India. While examining the underlying assumptions that inform the de-contextualisation of the globalised and philanthropy backed reform model, it analyses the key features of the intervention approach and presents the critiques and limitations. Beyond contextualisation, the paper makes a case for the need for non-state actors to take into account significant sociocultural and political differences in voluntary transfer of reform ideas. While acknowledging the significance of policy mobilities in bringing entrepreneurial solutions to educational problems across continents, the article recommends that such transfer must be driven by perceived necessity within local contexts.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

GIDEON SEUN OLANREWAJU, Aid for Rural Education Access Initiative (AREAi)

Chief Executive Director

Abiodun Yetunde Omotosho, Aid for Rural Education Access Initiative (AREAi)

Monitoring, Evaluation, Accountability and Learning Officer

Olajide Charles Falajiki, Aid for Rural Education Access Initiative (AREAi)

Community Engagement Manager

Godwin Osama, Aid for Rural Education Access Initiative (AREAi)

Senior Programs Officer


Akyeampong, K. (2004). Aid for Self-Help Effort ? A Sustainable Alternative Route to Basic Education in Northern Ghana. CICE Hiroshima University, Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 7(1), 41–52.

Blumenreich, M., & Gupta, A. (2015). The globalization of Teach for America: An analysis of the institutional discourses of Teach for America and Teach for India within local contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 87–96.

Burnett, N. (2017). Out-of-School Children ( OOSC ): Global , regional , and country perspectives.

Chandra Pandey, S. (2012). Right to Education Act, 2009 : Universalizing Elementary Education. India.

Chrisina, K.,Robinson,J., Spilka, S. (2006). Teach for All: Building a Pipeline of Future Education Leaders around the World.

DeStefano, J., & Schuh Moore, A. (2010). The roles of non-state providers in ten complementary education programmes. Development in Practice, 20(4–5), 511– 526.

DeStefano, J., Schuh Moore, A.,Balwanz, D and Harteliz, A. (2007). Reaching the Underserved: Complementary Models of Effective Schooling. EQUIP2: Educational Policy, Systems Development, and Management Is, 95(2), 195.

Exley S. (2014). The unstoppable rise of Teach for All. The Times Educational Supplement

Friedrich, D. S. (2014a). Global Microlending in Education Reform: Enseñá por Argentina and the Neoliberalization of the Grassroots. Comparative Education Review, 58(2), 296–321.

Friedrich, D. S. (2014b). Global Microlending in Education Reform: Enseñá por Argentina and the Neoliberalization of the Grassroots. Comparative Education Review.

Glazerman, S., Mayer, P. D. (2014). Alternative Routes to Teaching: The Impacts of Teach for America on Student Achievement and Other Outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(4), 1047–1049.

GoI [Government of India]. (1949) Constitution of India. New Delhi: Government of India.

GoI. (2015) Education in India, School Education (Numerical Data) 2000-2014. New Delhi:

Govinda, R. (2009). In the name of “poor and marginalized”? Politics of NGO activism with Dalit women in rural North India. Journal of South Asian Development, 4(1), 45–64.

Govinda, R., & Bandyopadhyay, M. (2008). Access to elementary education in India: Country analytical review. Children. Retrieved from

Gupta, A. (2012). How neoliberal globalization is shaping early childhood education policies in India, China, Singapore, Sri Lanka and the Maldives. Policy Futures in Education, 16(1), 11–28.

Heilig, J. V., & Jez, S. J. (2010). Teach For America: A review of the evidence.

Education and the Public Interest Center, (303). Jagannathan, S. (2001). The Role of Nongovernmental Organizations in Primary Education: A Study of Six NGOs in India.

Londe, P. G. La, Brewer, T. J., & Lubienski, C. A. (2015). Teach For America and Teach For All: Creating an Intermediary Organization Network for Global Education Reform. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, 47.

National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE). (2009). National curriculum frame- work for teacher education: Toward preparing professional and humane teachers. New Delhi: NCTE

Rose, P. (2009). NGO provision of basic education: Alternative or complementary service delivery to support access to the excluded? Compare, 39(2), 219–233.

Sayed, Y., Subrahmanian, R., Soudien, C., Carrim, N., Balgopalan, S., Nekhevha, F., & Samuel, M. (2007). Education Exclusion and Inclusion : Policy and Implementation in South Africa and India. Department for International Development.

Straubhaar, R., & Friedrich, D. (2015). epaa aape and its Impact on Global Education Reform.

Subramanian, V. K. (2018). From Government to Governance: Teach for India and New Networks of Reform in School Education. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 15(1), 21–50.

Talukdar, D., & Sharma, S. (2015). Teach for India : De-professionalization of Teaching, (2009), 2009–2012.

Thomas, J. (2007). Thinking about Teach For India 2 NOVEMBER 2010 4 COMMENTS, 1413(1.0517141518131414e+34).

Thomas, J. (2010). Thinking about Teach For India | Teacherplus. Retrieved from

Vellanki, V. (2014). Teach For India and Education Reform. Contemporary Education Dialogue.

UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2016) Children Out of School in Asia: Measuring Exclusion from Primary Education. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.




How to Cite

OLANREWAJU, . G. S., Omotosho, A. Y., Falajiki, O. C., & Osama, G. (2021). The Need for Context-specificity in Global Educational Policy Transfer by Non-state Actors: The Case of "Teach for All" to "Teach for India". International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 9(5), 711–721.

Most read articles by the same author(s)