Innovation and organizational performance as antecedents of competitive advantage in the context of beef cattle




Innovation, Innovation; performance, competitive advantage.


Agribusiness is a set of linked operations with the objective of producing, benefiting and distributing food. This sector deals with the various activities ranging from genetic improvement to the delivery of the final product. The agents, whether small or large, are inserted in at least some part of the production chain. In this context, it is noteworthy that the innovation that has been defined as a critical issue for cooperation networks. Theory has pointed out that innovation, and organizational performance, has an influence on competitive advantage. In view of this, the general objective of this study was to identify whether innovation and organizational performance are antecedents of competitive advantage in the context of beef cattle, in the view of agents working in cooperation networks in southern Brazil. Therefore, the method proposed for the development of this study is of a qualitative nature, operationalized through in-depth interviews and non-participatory observation. Nine producers were interviewed, from four cooperation networks in the states of Paraná, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul. The results obtained show that innovation and organizational performance are antecedents of competitive advantage, in the perception of the producers who participated in the study.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Janine Bertelli, University of Caxias Do Sul

Mestra em Administração pela Universidade de Caxias do Sul - UCS


AFUAH, A. How much do your co‐opetitors’ capabilities matter in the face of technological change? Strategic management journal, v. 21, n. 3, p. 397–404, 2000.

AKRAM, M. S. et al. Organizational performance and sustainability: exploring the roles of IT capabilities and knowledge management capabilities. Sustainability, v. 10, n. 10, p. 3816, 2018.

ALAIE, S. A. Knowledge and learning in the horticultural innovation system: A case of Kashmir valley of India. International Journal of Innovation Studies, v. 4, n. 4, p. 116–133, 1 dez. 2020.

ALBERTI, F. G.; PIZZURNO, E. Oops, I did it again! Knowledge leaks in open innovation networks with start-ups. European journal of innovation management, 2017.

AMIT, R.; SCHOEMAKER, P. J. H. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic management journal, v. 14, n. 1, p. 33–46, 1993.

ANDERSEN, P. H.; MEDLIN, C. J. Transient commitments and dynamic business networking. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 58, p. 11–19, 2016.

APROCCIMA. Filosofia da Associação. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2019.

ASHEIM, B. rn T. Industrial districts as ‘learning regions’: a condition for prosperity. European planning studies, v. 4, n. 4, p. 379–400, 1996.

ATALAY, M.; ANAFARTA, N.; SARVAN, F. The relationship between innovation and firm performance: An empirical evidence from Turkish automotive supplier industry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 75, p. 226–235, 2013.

ATTRIDE-STIRLING, Jennifer. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, v. 1, n. 3, p. 385-405, 2001.

BANBURY, C. M.; MITCHELL, W. The effect of introducing important incremental innovations on market share and business survival. Strategic management journal, v. 16, n. S1, p. 161–182, 1995.

BARNEY, J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, v. 17, n. 1, p. 99–120, 1991.

BEEF MARKET CENTRAL. FAO, Exportações mundiais de carne bovina: ranking de países - Beef2Live | Coma carne * viva melhor. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 3 jan. 2021.

BRAGA, M. J. Networks, strategic alliances and cooperation: The case of production chain of beef meat. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 39, n. SUPPL. 1, p. 11–16, 2010. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 22 jul. 2019.

BRYNJOLFSSON, Erik; HITT, Lorin M.; KIM, Heekyung Hellen. Strength in numbers: How does data-driven decisionmaking affect firm performance?. Available at SSRN 1819486, 2011.

BOWEN, Frances E.; ROSTAMI, Mahdi; STEEL, Piers. Timing is everything: A meta-analysis of the relationships between organizational performance and innovation. Journal of business research, v. 63, n. 11, p. 1179-1185, 2010.

CAMISÓN-ZORNOZA, César et al. A meta-analysis of innovation and organizational size. Organization studies, v. 25, n. 3, p. 331-361, 2004.

CHEN, Y. et al. Linking market orientation and environmental performance: The influence of environmental strategy, employee’s environmental involvement, and environmental product quality. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 127, n. 2, p. 479–500, 2015.

CARAYANNIS, Elias G. et al. Business model innovation as antecedent of sustainable enterprise excellence and resilience. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, v. 5, n. 3, p. 440-463, 2014.

CHENG, C. C. J.; HUIZINGH, E. K. R. E. When is open innovation beneficial? The role of strategic orientation. Journal of product innovation management, v. 31, n. 6, p. 1235–1253, 2014.

COOPERALIANÇA. Programa de Carne Angus Certificada. Disponível em: <>.

COOPERTROPAS. A Genuína Carne a Pasto da Serra Catarinense. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2019.

COOPERTROPAS. Coopertropas a genuína carne a pasto da Serra Catarinense. 2020

COVEY, S. R. Innovation at four levels. Executive Excellence, v. 10, p. 3, 1993.

CRESWELL, J. W. et al. Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The counseling psychologist, v. 35, n. 2, p. 236–264, 2007.

DAMANPOUR, F. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of management journal, v. 34, n. 3, p. 555–590, 1991.

DAMANPOUR, F.; ARAVIND, D. Managerial innovation: Conceptions, processes and antecedents. Management and organization review, v. 8, n. 2, p. 423–454, 2012.

DE MARTINO, M. et al. Logistics innovation in seaports: An inter-organizational perspective. Research in Transportation Business & Management, v. 8, p. 123–133, 2013.

DOSI, G. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of economic literature, p. 1120–1171, 1988.

DRUCKER, P. F. Inovacao e espirito empreendedor (entrepreneurship). [s.l.] Pioneira, 1986.

FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 1 maio. 2019.

FILIERI, R.; ALGUEZAUI, S. Extending the enterprise for improved innovation. Journal of Business Strategy, 2012.

FORD, D.; MOUZAS, S. The theory and practice of business networking. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 42, n. 3, p. 433–442, 2013.

FORKMANN, S.; HENNEBERG, S. C.; MITREGA, M. Capabilities in business relationships and networks: Research recommendations and directions. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 74, p. 4–26, 2018.

FREEMAN, C. The nature of innovation and the evolution of the productive system. [s.l.] MERIT, 1989.

FRIIS, O.; HOLMGREN, J.; ESKILDSEN, J. K. A strategy model–better performance through improved strategy work. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2016.

GARCÍA‐MORALES, Víctor J.; LLORÉNS‐MONTES, Francisco Javier; VERDÚ‐JOVER, Antonio J. The effects of transformational leadership on organizational performance through knowledge and innovation. British journal of management, v. 19, n. 4, p. 299-319, 2008.

GUMMESSON, Evert. Qualitative methods in management research. Sage, 2000.

GRANDORI, A.; SODA, G. Inter-firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms. Organization Studies, v. 16, n. 2, p. 183–214, 30 mar. 1995.

GRANT, R. M. Strategic planning in a turbulent environment: Evidence from the oil majors. Strategic management journal, v. 24, n. 6, p. 491–517, 2003.

HENRIQUES, E.; PEÇAS, P. New business models for the tooling industry. Journal of Current Issues in Finance, Business and Economics, v. 6, n. 2, p. 100, 2013.

HINA, S. M. et al. Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Firm Performance through Organizational Learning: The Moderating Role of Environmental Turbulence. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 2020.

HOSKISSON, Robert E. et al. Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum. Journal of management, v. 25, n. 3, p. 417-456, 1999.

HSIAN-MING, L.; HSIN-FENG, Y. Network resource meets organizational agility: Creating an idiosyncratic competitive advantage for SMEs. Management Decision, v. 58, n. 1, p. 58–75, 1 jan. 2020. Disponível em: <>.

IBGE. Agricultura, pecuária e outros . Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 13 jul. 2020.

JIMÉNEZ-JIMÉNEZ, Daniel; SANZ-VALLE, Raquel. Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of business research, v. 64, n. 4, p. 408-417, 2011.

HO, Catherine SF; MOHD-RAFF, Nor Erna Nabila. External and internal determinants of performances of Shariah and non-Shariah compliant firms. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 2019.

JONASH, R. S. O valor da inovação: como as empresas mais avançadas atingem alto desempenho e lucratividade. [s.l.] Campus, 2001.

KOBARG, S.; STUMPF-WOLLERSHEIM, J.; WELPE, I. M. More is not always better: Effects of collaboration breadth and depth on radical and incremental innovation performance at the project level. Research Policy, v. 48, n. 1, p. 1–10, 2019.

LAVIE, D. The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of management review, v. 31, n. 3, p. 638–658, 2006.

LEE, C.; LEE, K.; PENNINGS, J. M. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology‐based ventures. Strategic management journal, v. 22, n. 6‐7, p. 615–640, 2001.

LEE, C. M. J.; CHE-HA, N.; ALWI, S. F. S. Service customer orientation and social sustainability: The case of small medium enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 2020.

LIAO, S.; WU, C. The relationship among knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational performance. International journal of business and management, v. 4, n. 4, p. 64–76, 2009.

LÓPEZ-GAMERO, M. D.; MOLINA-AZORÍN, J. F.; CLAVER-CORTÉS, E. The whole relationship between environmental variables and firm performance: Competitive advantage and firm resources as mediator variables. Journal of environmental management, v. 90, n. 10, p. 3110–3121, 2009.

MARIOTTI, F.; HAIDER, S. Managing institutional diversity and structural holes: Network configurations for recombinant innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 160, p. 120237, 2020. Disponível em: <>.

MÖLLER, K.; SVAHN, S. Managing strategic nets: A capability perspective. Marketing theory, v. 3, n. 2, p. 209–234, 2003.

MÜLLER, Oliver; FAY, Maria; VOM BROCKE, Jan. The effect of big data and analytics on firm performance: An econometric analysis considering industry characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 35, n. 2, p. 488-509, 2018.

MYLAN, J. et al. Eco-innovation and retailers in milk, beef and bread chains: enriching environmental supply chain management with insights from innovation studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 107, p. 20–30, 2015.

NEELY, A.; GREGORY, M.; PLATTS, K. Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International journal of operations & production management, v. 25, n. 12, p. 1228–1263, 2005.

NEUMANN, M.; BARCELLOS, J. O. J. Estratégias de Coordenação: pricípios para a formação de alianças mercadológicas. Nespro, 2006.

NUSTINI, Yuni. Determinants of sustainable competitive advantage due to an it-enabled strategy. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, v. 11, n. 1, 2006.

NOKAKA, I. et al. Criação de conhecimento na empresa: como as empresas japonesas geram a dinâmica da inovação. Tradução de Ana Beatriz Rodrigues e Priscilla Martins Celeste. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1997.

PEDROSO OAIGEN, R. et al. Competitividade inter-regional de sistemas de produção de bovinocultura de corte. Ciência Rural, v. 43, n. 8, p. 1489–1495, 2013.

PETERAF, M. A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource‐based view. Strategic management journal, v. 14, n. 3, p. 179–191, 1993.

POPADIUK, S.; CHOO, C. W. Innovation and knowledge creation: How are these concepts related? International Journal of Information Management, v. 26, n. 4, p. 302–312, 2006. Disponível em: <>.

POPA, Simona; SOTO-ACOSTA, Pedro; MARTINEZ-CONESA, Isabel. Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: An empirical study in SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 118, p. 134-142, 2017.

PORTER, M. The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, v. 68, n. 2, p. 73–93, 1990.

PORTER, M. E. The competitive advantage of nations. [s.l.] Harvard Business School Management Programs Cambridge, 1993.

PRAHALAD, C. K.; HAMEL, G. The core competence of the corporation. In: Strategische Unternehmungsplanung/Strategische Unternehmungsführung. [s.l.] Springer, 1997. p. 969–987.

RICHARDS, P. J. et al. Measuring organizational performance as a dependent variable: Towards methodological best practice. Strategic Management Journal, v. 5, n. 2, 2009.

ROTHAERMEL, F. T. Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic management journal, v. 22, n. 6‐7, p. 687–699, 2001.

SAXTON, T. The effects of partner and relationship characteristics on alliance outcomes. Academy of management journal, v. 40, n. 2, p. 443–461, 1997.

SINGH, K.; MITCHELL, W. Precarious collaboration: Business survival after partners shut down or form new partnerships. Strategic management journal, v. 17, n. S1, p. 99–115, 1996.

SOEWARNO, N.; TJAHJADI, B.; ANMARISKA, F. Does PMS influence the strategy pillars: OPP relationship? Evidence from HEIs in Indonesia. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 2020.

STUART, T. E.; HOANG, H.; HYBELS, R. C. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative science quarterly, v. 44, n. 2, p. 315–349, 1999.

SZÉKELY, F.; KNIRSCH, M. Responsible leadership and corporate social responsibility:: Metrics for sustainable performance. European Management Journal, v. 23, n. 6, p. 628–647, 2005.

TAX, S. S.; MCCUTCHEON, D.; WILKINSON, I. F. The service delivery network (SDN) a customer-centric perspective of the customer journey. Journal of Service Research, v. 16, n. 4, p. 454–470, 2013.

TEECE, D. J.; PISANO, G.; SHUEN, A. Dynamic capability and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, v. 18, n. 7, 1997.

TÖDTLING, F.; LEHNER, P.; KAUFMANN, A. Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions? Technovation, v. 29, n. 1, p. 59–71, 2009.

AN DEN BOSCH, F. A. J.; VAN WIJK, R.; VOLBERDA, H. W. Absorptive capacity: Antecedents, models and outcomes. 2003.

VAN FENEMA, P. C.; KEERS, B. B. M. Rediscovering strategic content in ‘strong process’ research on business network innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, v. 91, p. 639–656, 2020. Disponível em: <>.

VAN MAANEN, J. Qualitative studies of organizations. [s.l.] Sage, 1998. v. 1

VAN, N. T.; CAO, N. N.; J.H., B. O. Identifying key success factors in supply chain management for increasing the competitive advantages of Vietnamese coffee. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, v. 27, n. 5, p. 438–461, 1 jan. 2017. Disponível em: <>.

VAN WIJK, R. et al. How firms shape knowledge to explore and exploit: A study of knowledge flows, knowledge stocks and innovative performance across units. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, v. 24, n. 9, p. 929–950, 2012.

WAGYU, A. B. dos C. de B. das R. Associação Brasileira dos Criadores de Bovinos das Raças Wagyu. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 8 fev. 2021.

WOGWU, V. E.; HAMILTON, D. I. Reconfiguration Capability and Competitive Advantage: A Study of Port Harcourt Public Health Sector. Management, v. 8, n. 2, p. 47–53, 2018.

ZHOU, W. et al. When do strategic orientations matter to innovation performance of green-tech ventures? The moderating effects of network positions. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 279, p. 123743, 2021.



DOI: 10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss4.3058

How to Cite

CAMARGO, M. E., Silva, J. E. A. da, Dullius, A. I. dos S., Bizotto, B. L. S., Motta, M. . E. V. da, & Bertelli, J. (2021). Innovation and organizational performance as antecedents of competitive advantage in the context of beef cattle. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 9(4), 288–303.
Received 2021-03-15
Accepted 2021-03-24
Published 2021-04-01

Most read articles by the same author(s)