CORPORATE EDUCATION

DRIVING ASPECTS TOWARDS NETWORKED CORPORATE UNIVERSITY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss4.3019

Keywords:

Corporate Education System, Evolution Stage of the Corporate Education System, Corporate University, Networked Corporate University, Driving Aspects

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the maturity evolution process of the stages of the corporate education system, listing the driving aspects of this process. To accomplish it, a qualitative research with a descriptive exploratory approach was carried out through an integrative review. The survey and systematic review were based on the analysis of existing scientific knowledge about "corporate education" and "evolution of the corporate education system". In the end, it is possible to list 25 driving factors for the evolution of the corporate education system to be considered by organizations that intend to reach the last stage of evolution, the Networked Corporate University (NCU), the most contemporary model proposed by the literature. In conclusion, this study brings theoretical contributions advancing on the existing theories and practices, as it can be considered that, when the Corporate Education System evolves towards the NCU stage, it will meet the context requirement that drives it to amplify the vision, beyond human capital, to social and relational capital.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Patrícia de Sá Freire, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Pedagogue with Specialization in Education Technology, Psycho-pedagogy, and Marketing, Master and Doctor in Engineering and Knowledge Management from Federal University of Santa Catarina(UFSC). She is currently leader of the Engineering of Integration and Knowledge Governance Research Group (ENGIN/CNPQ) of  UFSC, and Counselor of International Conference on Knowledge Management (ICKM).She has more than 30 years of experience in consulting and has been awarded twice by Make Award among the top 5 Knowledge Management executives in Brazil.

References

AMROU, S.; SEMMANN, M.; BÖHMANN, T. (2013) Managing for Transfer of Training: Directions

for the Evolution of Learning Management Systems. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas Conference

on Information Systems, Chicago, Illinois, August 15-17.

CRANCH, T. E. (1987). Corporate Classrooms. European Journal of Engineering, vol 12, nº 3.

FALAGAS, M. E.et al. (2008). Comparação de Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science e Google Scholar:

pontos fortes e fracos. FASEB Journal, 22 ( 2 ), 338 – 342.

FREIRE, P.S. et al. (2016a). Processos de implantação da Universidade Corporativa em Rede (UCR).

Espacios, vol. 37, nº 23.

FREIRE, P. S. et al. (2016b).Universidade Corporativa em Rede: considerações iniciais para um novo

modelo de educação corporativa. Espacios, Caracas, v. 37, n. 5.

FREIRE, P.S.; SILVA, T.C.; BRESOLIN, G.G., (Orgs). (2019). Universidade Corporativa em Rede:

diretrizes iniciais do modelo. Curitiba: CRV, 272 p.

GOLDSTEIN, I. L. (1980). Training in work organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, v. 31, n. 1, p.

-272.

HOURNEAUX, F.; EBOLI, M. P.; MARTINS, E. C. (2008, abr-jun). Corporate Education and the Role

of the Chief Learning Officer. RBGN - Revista Brasileira De Gestão De Negócios, v. 10, n. 27, p. 105-

KAPLAN, A.M., HAENLEIN, M. (2016). Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs,

SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster, Business Horizons, Volume 59, p 441-459.

KRAMER, R. (2018). Modelo de maturidade do sistema de educação corporativa. 2018. Dissertação

(Mestrado em Gestão do Conhecimento) - do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia e Gestão do

Conhecimento, Centro Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis.

MASALIMOVA, A. R.; SABIROVA, L.L. (2014). Multi-dimensional classification of types and forms

of corporate education. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 11 (7): 1054-1058.

MASALIMOVA, A.R.; USAK, M.; SHAIDULINA A.R. (2016). Advantages and disadvantages of

national and international corporate training techniques in adult education. Current Science, v. 111, n. 09.

MARGHERITA, A. & SECUNDO, G. (2009). The emergence of the stakeholder university, em Romano,

Aldo. Open Business Innovation Leadership: the emergence of the stakeholder university. Londres:

Palgrave Macmillan, 30 (2), 170-126.

MEISTER, J. C. (1999). Educação corporativa: a gestão do capital intelectual através das universidades

corporativas. São Paulo: Makron Books.

OHMAE, K. (1991). Mundo sem fronteiras. São Paulo: Makron Books.

SILVA, T.C. (2019). Framework Ponte TAP: Gestão da curva de aprendizagem para a efetivação da

transferência de aprendizagem para a prática do trabalho. Tese (Doutorado em Gestão do Conhecimento)

- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento, Centro Tecnológico,

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis.

SILVA, T. C.; FREIRE, P. de S. (2017). Universidade Corporativa em Rede: Diretrizes que devem ser

gerenciadas para a implantação do modelo. Espacios, v. 38, n. 10.

SILVA, S. W.; SARSUR, A.M.; VASCONCELOS, M.C.R.L. (2016). E-Learning e Educação

Corporativa: a análise de um programa a partir do princípio da conectividade. Espacios, vol. 37, p. 29.

TEECE, D.J. (2000). Managing Intellectual Capital. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Downloads

Published

01-04-2021

How to Cite

Silva Neves, M., & de Sá Freire, P. (2021). CORPORATE EDUCATION: DRIVING ASPECTS TOWARDS NETWORKED CORPORATE UNIVERSITY. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 9(4), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss4.3019

Most read articles by the same author(s)