Antifungal activity of some alternative control against mango anthracnose in Senegal


  • Yaya Diallo UFR
  • P. M. Diedhiou Université Gaston Berger image/svg+xml
  • Elisabeth Bush Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg
  • Mizuho Nita Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg
  • Anton Baudoin Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg



Mangifera indica, anthracnose control, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, fungicides, Sodium molybdate, biocontrol products


Mango production in the South of Senegal is exposed to intensive rainfall from late May to October, with high temperature and moisture levels. These conditions are conducive for the development of anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (sensu lato) and leading to an absolute necessity for adequate control measures for good quality mango production. Anthracnose disease causes both pre- and postharvest fruit spots and fruit rot as well as premature fruit drop. The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of several fungicide alternatives (fertilizers and biological control agents) against mango anthracnose in Senegal comparatively to standard fungicides. Field trials were set up in contrasting climates conditions and involved three orchards in the Northern part of the country with a short rainy season and dry climate over 9 to 10 months a year and three other orchards in the Southern part of Senegal with in a humid tropic environment. No anthracnose was recorded in the orchards in northern Senegal. In the south, in contrast, the disease was actual. Among the treatments tested for the control of anthracnose, Sodium molybdate were found effective after fungicides (azoxystrobin and thiophanate methyl). All the alternative treatments to fungicides provided a statistically significant control to the disease as compared to the control


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Yaya Diallo, UFR

Sciences Agronomiques d’Aquaculture et des Technologies Alimentaires

P. M. Diedhiou, Université Gaston Berger

UFR des Sciences Agronomiques d’Aquaculture et des Technologies Alimentaires (UFR S2ATA)


W.S. Conway, C.E. Sams, J. Abbott, and B.D. Bruten (1991). Post-harvest treatment of apple fruit provides broad-spectrum protection against post-harvest pathogens. Plant Disease 75, 620–622.

Y. Diallo, P. M. Diedhiou, E. Bush, M. Nita and A. Baudoin (2021). Characterization of Colletotrichum species causing mango anthracnose in Senegal. International Journal of Science and Research. 10(1), 365 - 370.


P. M. Diedhiou, N. Mbaye, A. Dramé, and P. I. Samb (2007).Alteration of post-harvest disease of mango (Mangiferaindica) through production practices and climatic factors. African Journal of Biotechnology, 6: (9), 1087-1094.

P. M. Diedhiou, Y. Diallo, R. Faye, A. A. Mbengue, and A. Sene (2014a). Efficacy of different fungicides against mango anthracnose in Senegalese Soudanianagroclimate.American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5, 2224-2229.

P.M. Diedhiou, S.A.G. Diop, N. Mbaye, I. Diedhiou, Y. Diallo, R. Faye and P.I. Samb (2014b). Mango rotting in southern Senegal, a big phytosanitary challenge.International Journal of Biosciences, 5: 183-188.

J.C. Dodd, D. Prusky, and P. Jeffries (1997). Fruit diseases. In: Litz, R.E. (ed.) The Mango:Botany, Production and Uses. CABI. pp. 257‐280.

B. K. Dutta, and E. Bremmer (1981). Trace elements as plant chemo therapeutants to control Verticillium wilt. Z. Pflanzenkrankh. Pflanzenschutz 88:405-412.

V. Govender, and L. Korsten (2006). Evaluation of different formulations of Bacillus licheniformisin mango packs house trials. Biological Control 37:237‐242.

I.G.N. Hewajulige, W.R.S. Wigeratnam (2010). Alternative postharvest treatments to control anthracnose disease in papaya during storage. Fresh produce, 4:15-20

M.J. Hu, A. Grabke, M.E. Dowling, and G. Schnabel (2015). Resistance in Colletotrichum siamense from peach and blueberry to thiophanate methyl and azoxystrobin.Plant Disease.99:806-814.

F. Jenny, N. Sultana, M. M. Islam, M.M. Khandaker and M. B. A. Bhuiyan (2019). A review on anthracnose of mango caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Bangladesh J. Plant Pathol. 35(1&2):65-74

A. S. Kumar, N. P. E. Reddy, K. H. Reddy, and M. C. Devi (2007). Evaluation of fungicidal resistance among Colletotrichum gloeosporioides isolates causing mango anthracnose in Agri Export Zone of Andhra Pradesh, India Plant Pathology Bull. 16: 157-160.

Mc. Millan (1984). Control of mango anthracnose with foliar sprays.Proc. Florida State Horticulture Society 97:344-345.

G.A. Peralta (2004). Field evaluation of Bacillus subtilis (QST 713 strain) for the control of mango anthracnose. Philippines Univ. Los Banos, College, Laguna (Philippines). National Crop Protection Center.

L. R. Polanco, F. A. Rodrigues, E. N. Moreira, H. S. S. Duarte, I. S. Cacique, L. A. Valente, R. F. Vieira, T. J. Paula Júnior, and F. X. R. Vale (2014). Management of anthracnose in common bean by foliar sprays of potassium silicate, sodium molybdate, and fungicide. Plant Disease 98:84-89.

A.L. Senghor, W.J. Liang, and W.C. Ho (2007). Integrated control of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides on mango fruit in Taiwan by the combination of Bacillus subtilis and fruit bagging, Biocontrol Science and Technology, 17:8, 865-870.

S. Sundravadana, D. Alice, S. Kuttalam, and R. Samiyappan (2006). Control of mango anthracnose by azoxystrobin. Tunisian Journal of Plant Protection 1: 109-114.

C.L. Wilson, J.M. Solar, A. El-Ghaouth, and M.E. Wisniewski (1997). Rapid evaluation of plant extracts and essential oils for antifungal activity against Botrytis cinerea. Pl



DOI: 10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss2.2949

How to Cite

Diallo, Y., Diedhiou, P. M., Bush, E., Nita, M., & Baudoin, A. (2021). Antifungal activity of some alternative control against mango anthracnose in Senegal. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 9(2), 239–246.
Received 2021-01-14
Accepted 2021-01-23
Published 2021-02-01