Patent Profile of the Patent Deposits of FINEP Participants with CT-Petro Resources
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article presents the patent filing profile of the participants of CT-Petro edicts. The release of the notices and analysis of projects are in charge of FINEP, the period analyzed will be from 1998 to 2018. Since this is the oil and natural gas production chain, the general objective of the referred work is to verify if the IPC - International Patent Classification C10, was present in the deposits of the participants. As well as, among the CPI codes, the nomenclature with the highest frequency of presentation. For the robustness of the work, the historical contextualization and definition of patents, Patentiometry and the International Patent Classification - IPC, adopted by the National Institute of Industrial Property - INPI, were performed. The literature review highlights the importance given to patents for technological and economic development. The methodology applied has a qualitative and quantitative character, the sample studied are the institutions that had projects approved by FINEP. In short, the article seeks to outline the profile of patents developed in the participating institutions and whether this profile will reflect positive results for CT-Petro.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
References
BRASIL. Lei nº 9.279, de 14 de maio de 1996. Regula direitos e obrigações relativos à propriedade industrial. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9279.htm. Acesso em: jun de 2019.
FABRIS, J. P. Conexões entre Empresas e Universidades. Tese de Doutorado em Ciência da Propriedade Intelectual. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Propriedade Intelectual. Universidade Federal de Sergipe. São Cristóvão. SE. 2016.
FINEP - Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos. Disponível em: www.finep.gov.br. Acesso em: mar/2019.
GII – Global Innovation Index. Disponível em: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/Home>.
INPI – Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial. Disponível em: http://www.inpi.gov.br/. Acesso em: mai/2019.
INPI – Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial. Disponível em: http://www.inpi.gov.br/. Acesso em: mar/2020.
LEYDESDORF, L. Indicators of innovation in a knowledgebased economy. CiberMetrics: International Journal of Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics, v.5, n.1, 2001.
MENDES, M. L. S.; MELO, D. R. A. de. Avaliação Tecnológica: Uma Proposta Metodológica. RAC, Rio de Janeiro, v. 21, n. 4, pp. 569-584, Julho/Agosto, 2017. Disponível em:
OLIVEIRA, L. B. de, RUSSO, S. L., MARQUES, L. G. A., & GOMILA, J. M. V. (2019). Technological productivity on control of Boophilus Microplus tick: A Patentometric Study. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 6(2). Retrieved from http://journal-repository.com/index.php/ijaers/article/view/1032
OMPI – Organização Mundial da Propriedade Intelectual. Curso DL101PBR – DL- 101 Curso Geral de Propriedade Intelectual – DL101PBR. 2016.
OMPI – Organização Mundial da Propriedade Intelectual. Guide IPC Classificação. 2019.
QUEIROZ, N. M. Os Fundos Setoriais de CT&I: o caso do CT-Petro e sua execução pelo CNPq. Dissertação de Mestrado. Centro de Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Universidade de Brasília. Brasília. DF. 2006. Disponível em: http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/4771
SENADO. Relatório CCT – Avaliação de Políticas Públicas. Comissão de Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovação, Comunicação e Informática. Fundos de Incentivo ao Desenvolvimento Tecnológico. Brasília. DF. 2016. Disponível em: http://legis.senado.leg.br/comissoes/comissao;jsessionid=40CC56D0FEB47563FD0AB66BB0EF48CC?0&codcol=1363. Acesso em: mar/abr 2019.
SOUZA, N. V. de; ALMEIDA, N. N. de. As Patentes no Cenário Brasileiro e a Necessidade de Políticas Públicas para Aumento do Número de Registros Patentários no Âmbito da Defesa. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Estratégicos. Instituto de Estudos Estratégicos – UFF. v. 11, n. 21, p. 37-69. 2019.
VAN RAAN, A.F.J. Sleeping beauties cited in patents: Is there also a dormitory of inventions?. Scientometrics 110, 1123–1156 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2215-8