“Skill, drill, and kill”

Zimbabwean Teachers’ views on once-off summative assessment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss2.2899

Keywords:

summative, experiences, high stakes testing, balanced, holistic assessment

Abstract

This paper reports on teachers’ summative assessment experiences at grade seven level in selected primary schools in Chegutu District, Mashonaland West Province in Zimbabwe. The study's purpose was to determine the effect and impact the final, standardised, and high-stakes assessment have on teaching and learning at grade seven level in these primary schools. Using a qualitative research design, we generated data from eight teachers who were purposefully selected from four of the different primary schools found in Zimbabwe (rural, farm, urban, and boarding). Semi-structured interviews, documents, and records analysis were employed as data generation to allow for rich and detailed information from all available sources for this research. This paper presents and discusses the data about teachers’ summative evaluation experiences at grade seven in the Zimbabwean education system. The findings reveal a severe effect and impact of end-of-year grade seven examinations on teachers, instructional practices, the curriculum, the learners, and the education system. It also shows that teachers depend excessively on drilling and repetitious revision practices to meet the standards required and expected by stakeholders. The findings further reveal contradicting responses from teachers on enhancing learners’ performance from drilling and coaching. There emerged from the findings a consensus among teachers on merging formative, continuous, and summative assessment forms. This paper suggests a more balanced and holistic assessment structure at grade seven level that caters to learners' diverse populations and environments in Zimbabwe.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Lokesh Ramnath Maharajh, University of KwaZulu-Natal

Senior Lecturer, School of Education

References

Aftab, A., Qureshi, S., & William, I. (2014). Investigating the washback effect of the Pakistani Intermediate English Examination. International Journal of English and Literature, 5(7), 149-154.

Andrews, S., Fullilove, J., & Wong, Y. (2002). Targeting washback—a case-study. System, 30(2), 207-223.

Berliner, D. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 287-302.

Blazer, C. (2011). Unintended Consequences of High-Stakes Testing. Information Capsule. Volume 1008. Research Services, Miami-Dade County Public Schools.

Brookhart, S. M., & Nitko, A. J. (2014). Educational assessment of students. Washington, DC: Pearson Higher Ed.

Crocco, M. S., & Costigan, A. T. (2007). The narrowing of curriculum and pedagogy in the age of accountability urban educators speak out. Urban Education, 42(6), 512-535.

Dhindsa, H. S., Omar, K., & Waldrip, B. (2007). Upper secondary Bruneian science students’ perceptions of assessment. International Journal of Science Education, 29(10), 1261-1280.

Dodge, T. (2007). Impact of Standardized Testing Emphasis on Teaching and Learning in Kindergarten through 12th Grade in United States Schools: East Tennessee Principals' Perspectives.

Dutro, E., & Selland, M. (2012). “I Like to Read, but I Know I’m Not Good at It”: Children’s Perspectives on High‐Stakes Testing in a High‐Poverty School. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(3), 340-367.

Gebril, A., & Brown, G. T. (2014). The effect of high-stakes examination systems on teacher beliefs: Egyptian teachers’ conceptions of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(1), 16-33.

Gorman, L. (2015). Peer effects in the classroom.

Hedwick, C., Mavies, K., Madungwe, L. and Mandiudza, L. (2013). The impact of examinations on the school curriculum: A Zimbabwean perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(1), 65-74.

Jones, B. D. (2007). The unintended outcomes of high-stakes testing. Journal of applied school psychology, 23(2), 65-86.

Kanyongo, G. Y. (2005). Zimbabwe's Public Education System Reforms: Successes and Challenges. International Education Journal, 6(1), 65-74.

Kirkpatrick, R., & Zang, Y. (2011). The negative influences of exam-oriented education on Chinese high school students: Backwash from classroom to child. Language testing in Asia, 1(3), 36.

Kizlik, B. (2012). Measurement, assessment, and evaluation in education. Retrieved October, 10, 2015.

Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2012). The impact of high stakes testing: The Australian story. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(1), 65-79.

Minarechová, M. (2012). Negative impacts of high-stakes testing. Journal of Pedagogy/Pedagogický Casopis, 3(1), 82-100.

Muranda, A. Z., Tshabalala, T., Ncube, A. C., & Gazimbe, P. (2016). An Investigation into the Causes of Low Pass Rate at Grade Seven Final Examinations in Mudzi District in Mashonaland East Province. Nova Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(4).

Mussawy, S. A. J. (2009). Assessment practices: Student’s and teachers’ perceptions of classroom assessment.

Nziramasanga, C.T. (1999). The Presidential Commission of Inquiry into Education and National Report of the Republic of Zimbabwe. Harare, Zimbabwe: Government Printer.

Polesel, J., Dulfer, N., & Turnbull, M. (2012). The experience of education: The impacts of high stakes testing on school students and their families. Sydney, Australia: The Whitlam Institute.

Popham, W. J. (2008). Formative Assessment: Seven Stepping-Stones to Success. Principal Leadership, 9(1), 16-20.

Ritt, M. (2016). The impact of high-stakes testing on the learning environment.

Russell, M., Madaus, G., & Higgins, J. (2009). The paradoxes of high stakes testing: How they affect students, their parents, teachers, principals, schools, and society: IAP

Spann, P., & Kaufman, D. (2015). The negative effects of high-stakes testing.

Taras, M. (2008). Summative and formative assessment: Perceptions and realities. Active learning in higher education, 9(2), 172-192.

Zimbabwe School Examinations Council (ZIMSEC) (n.d). A training manual on the setting and marking of grade seven classroom tests. Harare, Zimbabwe: Research and Development Division.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-01
CITATION
DOI: 10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss2.2899

How to Cite

Maharajh, L. R., & Musikewa, L. T. (2021). “Skill, drill, and kill”: Zimbabwean Teachers’ views on once-off summative assessment. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 9(2), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss2.2899
Received 2020-12-14
Accepted 2021-01-05
Published 2021-02-01