Contextualisation Method for Measuring the Degree of Innovation in Micro and Small Enterprises

Main Article Content

André Luiz Gomes de Souza
Gabriel Francisco da Silva

Abstract

The methodologies proposed for measuring the degree of corporate innovation require a relevant selection of indicators. Nowadays, there is a growing number of indicators that can be used to describe innovation management and measure the degree of innovation. However, these indicators only provide a partial outlook of the degree of innovation, being often incomplete. Therefore, it is important to create compound indexes comprising different indicators, weighting factors and coefficients able to contextualise the conditions and characteristics of the elements analysed. This enables an assessment of the importance of contextualising indicators for measuring the degree of innovation based on the influence of different weighting factors and coefficients directly related to the context analysed. In this regard, the present work was aimed at contextualising the tool used for measuring the impact of innovation – INOVA-tec – and draw a comparison with the Innovation Radar for measuring the degree of innovation of a Micro and Small Enterprise (MSE). In addition, the present work developed a new methodological approach focused on contextualising the process for measuring the degree of innovation of business organisations based on the analysis of two MSEs. Both methodologies were applied for the measurement of the degree of innovation of 2 different retail companies from the textile and clothing sector. The results obtained concluded that the adapted version of INOVA-tec allows to contextualise the process of measuring the degree of innovation in MSEs by considering different perspectives and particularities taking into account the context of the companies analysed and the innovation actions implemented. Moreover, it enabled to assess the relevance of the indicators with regards to the value chain or type of service provided, considering different time frames and geographical scopes of the actions and their respective impacts. The adapted version of INOVA-tec also provides a greater range of analysis of the results, with a wider scope of categories which are directly proportional to the weighting criteria, weight ranges and correction factors adopted in the indicators considered. The Innovation Radar, which provided a contextualisation of the indicators analysed, showed an overlap of the degree of innovation between the different profiles of business innovation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gomes de Souza, A. L., & da Silva, G. F. (2020). Contextualisation Method for Measuring the Degree of Innovation in Micro and Small Enterprises. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 8(11), 536–554. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol8.iss11.2782
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

André Luiz Gomes de Souza, Federal University of Sergipe

Postgraduate Program in Intellectual Property Science

Gabriel Francisco da Silva, Federal University of Sergipe

Postgraduate Program in Intellectual Property Science

References

A. Furtado and S. Queiroz, A construção de indicadores de inovação, Revista Conhecimento & Inovação, São Paulo, 2007, pp. 26-28.

A.L.G. Souza and G.F. Silva, Contextualização da mensuração do grau de inovação através da aplicação do INOVA-tec, Anais do VI Encontro Nacional de Propriedade Intelectual, Aracaju, 2020, pp. 1310 – 1318.

A. M. Cavalcanti, F. F. R. Santos, J. A. O. Cerqueira, E. G. Nery, C. M. D. A. Barros, Diagnóstico da indústria de confecções a partir do radar e característico de inovação. Exacta – EP, v. 13, n. 1, São Paulo, 2015, pp. 105-114.

A. T. S. Néto and R. M. Teixeira, Mensuração do Grau de Inovação de Micro e Pequenas Empresas: Estudo em Empresas da Cadeia Têxtil- Confecção em Sergipe, Revista de Administração e Inovação, v. 8, n. 3, São Paulo, 2011, pp.205-229.

A. T. S. Néto. Mensuração do grau da inovação em micro e pequenas empresas do Estado de Sergipe, Universidade federal de Sergipe, Dissertação (Mestrado Profissional em Desenvolvimento Regional e Gestão de Empreendimentos Locais), São Cristóvão, 2012, 165p.

D. L. Bachmann and J. H, Destefani. Metodologia para estimar o grau de inovação nas MPE. Anais do Seminário Nacional de Parques Tecnológicos e Incubadoras de Empresas, Aracaju, SE, Brasil, 18. 2008.

F.G. Silva, A. Hartman and D.R. Reis, Avaliação do nível de inovação tecnológica nas organizações: desenvolvimento e teste de uma metodologia, Revista Produção Online, v.8, n.4, 2008.

G. D. G. Carvalho, W. V. Silva, A. C. S. Póvoa and H. G. Carvalho, Radar da inovação como ferramenta para o alcance de vantagem competitiva para micro e pequenas empresas. Revista de Administração e Inovação, v. 12, n. 4, São Paulo, 2015, pp. 162-186.

K. R. E. Jesus, Sistema de avaliação de impactos de inovações tecnológicas: INOVA-tec system v. 2.0. Embrapa Meio Ambiente, São Paulo, 2011. 34 p.

K. R. E. Jesus, Impact assessment system for technological innovation: Inova-tec System. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, volume 2, issue 2, Santiago, 2007, pp. 67-82.

M. Sawhney, R. C. Wolcott and I. Arroniz, The 12 different ways for companies to innovate, MIT Sloan Management Review, v. 47, n. 3, Massachusetts, 2006, pp. 75-81.

M. S. Martin and M. J. Namusonge, Influence of innovation on small and medium enterprise (SME) growth-a case of garment manufacturing industries in Nakuru County, International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, vol.2, n. 05, 2014, pp. 31-41.

Organização para Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico - OCDE. Manual de Oslo: Diretrizes para Coleta e Interpretação de Dados sobre Inovação, OCDE, 3 ed., Paris, 136p.

P. F. G. Nascimento, Gestão da inovação: análise do grau de maturidade 2009 em Empresas de TI do Estado de Minas Gerais. FIPEL, Dissertação de Mestrado Profissional em Administração, Pedro Leopoldo, 2009. 101p.

P. N. Figueiredo, Acumulação tecnológica e inovação industrial: conceitos, mensuração e evidências no Brasil. São Paulo em perspectiva, v. 19, n. 1, São Paulo, 2005, pp. 54-69.