Main Article Content
This paper examines multiple relationships among several concepts to determine common causes to delinquency and to suggest intelligence-based alternative to resolve this public health hazard. Juvenile crime has become a public health hazard because the regularity, brutality and impunity by which juveniles commit their crimes these days is indescribable and their state of mind is “unplaced”. Delinquency may be defined as the behavior consequent to the failure of adults and the village to exercise their moral superiority and integrity to produce behavior that conforms to standards set as norms with some degree of consistency in a society to which legal sanctions are leveled (Obinyan, E. 2011). Adult's moral superiority may be defined as the ability to recognize the differences between acceptable and unacceptable behavior….Adult's moral integrity may be defined as the ability of individual adults to refrain from unacceptable behavior and to communicate to youths through example, conventional acceptable behavior (Obinyan, 2011).
Village moral superiority entails the ability of each group, community or the society at large to establish norms that are consistent with cultural values. Village moral integrity entails the ability of the village as a whole to uphold, reinforce, and consistently demonstrate and communicate the sanctity of these cultural norms. Moral strength, therefore is the combined effect of the village and adult’s moral superiority and integrity (Obinyan). Children and youth social contexts are important contributors of problem behavior (Dishion, Forgatch, VanRyzin, & Winter, 2012; Dodge, 1983). In deviant peer groups, it is common for youth to engage in deviancy training wherein deviant behaviors are reinforced such that discussion of rule-breaking behavior is linked with a positive consequence (e.g., affirmation; Dishion, Spracklen, Andrews, & Patterson, 1996). Youth association with deviant peers is associated with many problematic outcomes (e.g., drug use, violence; Dishion, Eddy, Haas, Li, & Spracklen, 1997; Dision, Capaldi, Spracklen, & Li, 1995; Dishion & Patterson, 2006).
Delinquency results when there is a relative absence of adult and village action, such as lack of moral integrity and respect for societal norms, a breakdown of unofficial social control and adult and the village inability to agree on the definition of what behavior may be regarded as delinquent. This is why delinquency may be seen as a function of the type of relationships between adults and the village, and their perception of and attitude toward delinquency. For a particular person however, the definition of delinquency may depend greatly upon their cultural background and the inability of the adult and the village to properly use their moral superiority and integrity to impact on all members of their communities. In most cases, the relative weakness of adult and village moral strength should account for the delinquent behavior. When delinquent recidivism becomes a problem and a continuation of delinquent behavior is consistent and intensifies, we would expect that the steam or vitality of adult and village moral strength (moral superiority and integrity) has been let out.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
Austin, J. Leonard, K.K., Pope, C.E., and Feyerherm, W.H. 1995. Racial disparities in the Juvenile Justice System.
Bachman, R., & Coker, A. (1995). Police involvement in domestic violence: The interactive effects of victim injury, offender’s history of violence, and race. Violence and Victims, 10(2), 91-106.
Berk, S.F., & Loseke, D. (1981). “Handling” family violence: Situational determinants of police arrest in domestic disturbances. Law and Society Review, 15(2), 317-346.
Bishop, D. and C. Frazier 1988 “The influence of Race in juvenile justice processing” Journal of research in crime and delinquency 25(3): 242 – 263
Bishop, D., and Frazier, C.E. Race effects in juvenile justice decision-making: Findings in a Statewide analysis. Criminal Law and Criminology 86(2):392 – 414.
Burt, S.A., Barnes, A.R., McGue, M., & Lacono, W.G. (2008). Parental divorce and adolescent delinquency: Ruling out the impact of common genes. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1668-1677.
Comanor, W.S., & Phillips, L. (2002). The impact of income and family structure on delinquency. Journal of Applied Economics, 5, 209-232.
Cox, A., Judith. (2000). An assistant chief probation officer in Santa Cruz County Probation Officer Santa Cruz County Probation. Building Blocks for Youth, addressing Disproportionate minority representation within the juvenile justice system. Santa Cruz, CA.
Demuth, S., & Brown, S.L. (2004). Family structure, family processes, and adolescent delinquency: The significance of parental absence versus parental gender. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41, 58-81.
Dunifon, R., & Kowaleski-Jones, L. (2002). Who’s in the house? Race differences in cohabitation, single parenthood, and child development. Child Development, 73, 1249-1264.
Eitle, D. (2005). The moderating effects of peer substance use on the family structure- adolescent substance use association: Quantity versus quality of parenting. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 963-980.
Feder, L. (1998). Police handling of domestic and nondomestic calls: Is there a case for discrimination? Crime and Delinquency, 44(2), 335-349.
Fisher, P.A., Leve, L.D., O’Leary, C.C., & Leve, C. (2003). Parental monitoring of children’s behavior: Variation across stepmother, stepfather, and two-parent biological families. Family Relations, 52(1), 45-52.
Fyfe, J., Klinger, D., & Flavin, J. (1997). Differential police treatment of male-on-female spousal violence. Criminology, 35(3), 455-473.
Hess, R., & Tapp, J. (1969). Authority, rules, and aggression: A cross-national study of the socialization of children into compliance systems, Part I. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education.
Jone-Brown, D. (2000a). Debunking the myth of officer friendly: How African American males experience community policing, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 16(2), 209-229.
Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 1999 National Report. For a full listing of sources for these chapters, see pages 49, 84, and 140 of the National Report.
Kolodziejski, D., Stilwell, J., Torchiana, K., & Markowitz, M. (2000). Black and white perceptions of the appropriateness of police conduct. In M. Markowitz & D.Jones-Brown (Eds.), The system in black and white: Exploring the connections between race, crime and justice (pp. 125-134). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Lasley, J. (1994). The impact of the Rodney King incident on citizen attitudes toward police. Policing and Society, 3, 245-255.
Loeber, R. (1999). Antisocial behaviour: More enduring than changeable? Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 30, 303-397.
Mauer, M., & Huling, T. (1995). Young black Americans and the criminal justice system: Five years later. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.
Mcdermid, L., Connolly, K., Macallair, D., & Schiraldi, V. (1996). From classrooms to cell blocks: How prison building affects higher education and African American enrollment. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Institute
McDonald, D.C., & Carlson, K.E. (1993). Sentencing in dederal courts” Does race matter? The transition of sentencing guidelines, 1980-1990. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
McIntyre, C. (1993). Criminalizing a race: Free blacks during slavery. Queens, NY: Kayode.
Miller, S. (1989). Unintended side effects of pro-arrest policies and their race and class implications for battered women: A cautionary note. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 3(3), 299-317.
Murphy A, Steele M, Dube SR, Bate J, Bonuck K, Meissner P, et al. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) questionnaire and adult attachment interview (AAI): implications for parent child relationships. Child Abuse Negl. 2014; 38(2):224–33. 19. Luyten P, Nijssens L, Fonagy P, Mayes LC.
National Association for the Advancement of White People. (1999). More black men headed to prison: According to the Department of Justice. Accessed April 11, 2000, at:
Parental reflective functioning: theory, research, and clinical applications. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child. 2017;70(1):174–99.
Population Data Source: U.S. Population Estimates by Age, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin: 1980-1998, U.S. Census Bureau, (1999).
Rasche, C. (1995). Minority women and domestic violence: The unique dilemmas of battered women of color. In B. Price & N. Sokoloff (Eds.), The criminal justice system and women (pp.246-261). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Reiman, J. (1998). The rich get richer and the poor get prison. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Sedlak, J., Andrea, Ph.D. & Broadhurst, D., Diane, M.L.A. (1996). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families Administration on Children, Youth and Families National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect.
Source: Adapted from Juvenile Arrests 1998, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (1999) and Crime in the United States, 1998, Federal Bureau of Investigation (1999).
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (1997). National household survey on drug abuse: Population estimates 1996. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Tapp, J. (1987, September). Legal socialization across age, culture, and context: Psychological considerations for children and adults. Paper presented at Rutgers University, Newark, NJ.
U.S. Department of Justice. (1997-1999). Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Juvenile Offenders and Victims National Report Series. Juvenile Offenders in Residential Placement.
Waaland, P., & Keeley, S. (1985). Police decision making in wife abuse: The impact of legal and extralegal factors. Law and Human Behavior, 9(4), 355-366.
Webb, V., & Marshall, C. (1995). The relative importance of race and ethnicity on citizens’ attitudes toward the police. American Journal of Police, 16(2), 45-66.
Weikel, D. (1995, May 21). Crack war raged by race. Denver Post, pp. 1A, 7A.
Wilson, W.J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.