Main Article Content
Practitioner engagement is not an easy task in teaching in higher education. In fact, there is much evidence now to propose a strong relationship between active engagement and the quality of the teaching experience. But what exactly do we mean by ‘engagement’? For many it simply refers to assisting students to connect with the subject material in a way that generates interest, enjoyment and interaction. Generating active participation is particularly important in tutorials or small group teaching, where tutorials ‘by design’, are intended to provide students a different kind of learning experience than the lecture. It is also through active engagement that both, teachers and students take greater ownership for their teaching craft and learning process. This concept assists in the development of an overall design or structure to support such engagement and active participation. The more organized and clear the teachers and students are, the more likely it is that they will get the desired and target results. In addition to this, active engagement of teachers should be reinforced by a reflective practice which is an active process too of attending to their own experience of teaching in order to explore it in some depth. It is in fact a ‘dialogue of thinking and doing through which teachers become more skilled. This process develops by thinking critically and deeply about what teachers are doing in order that they may transform that experience and reapply it in new contexts. In many respects, Professional Development in training and tutoring has been designed to motivate reflection on one’s teaching practice and mostly where teachers have an opportunity to see others in practice. The article’s results have been derived from the interpretation of the data collected through designing an interview addressed to the only special student of the department and show the researcher’s experience as a teacher and an administrator with Abdenour, this is how I like to call him, a blind student, but his determination and willingness to succeed in his higher studies made of him a remarkable young man. Special tutoring and training sessions have been designed to enable him fully integrate the learning community. Therefore, this article has been directed to focalize on the pedagogical decisions based on implementing and considering the training and tutoring sessions as a necessity to develop first the teaching craft and then help, advise and guide our students towards more success in their studies. Is not it mentioned in the official document (Journal officiel de la République Algérienne N°23 du 4 Mai, 2008 ; articles 33,34, 35, …) « to receive the students 3 hours/week to advise and orient them »?
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
Bryant A. L., Schulenberg, J., Bachman, J. G., O’Malley, P. M., & Johnston, L. D. (2000). Understanding the links among school misbehavior, academic achievement, and cigarette use: A national panel study of adolescents. Prevention Science 1(2), 71‐87.
Chapman, E. (1998). Key considerations in the design and implementation of effective peer‐assisted learning programs. In K. Topping & S. Ehly (Eds.), Peer‐Assisted Learning (pp. 67‐84). Mahwah,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta‐analysis of
findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 237‐248.
Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., & Moody, S. W. (2000). How effective are on‐to‐one tutoring
programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta‐analysis of the
intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 605‐619.
Gordon, E. E., Morgan, R. R., Ponticell, J. A., & O’Malley, C. J. (2004). Tutoring solutions for No Child Left
Behind: Research, practice, and policy implications. NASSP Bulletin, 88(638), 59‐68.
Gordon, E. E. (2009). 5 ways to improve tutoring programs. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(6), 440‐445.
Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other
drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse
prevention. Psychological Bulletin 112(1), 64‐105.
Jenkins, J. R., & Jenkins, L. M. Making peer tutoring work. (1987, March). Educational Leadership 44(6), 64‐68.
Juel, C. (1996). What makes literacy tutoring effective? Reading Research Quarterly, 31(3), 268‐289
Hock, M. F., Pulvers, K. A., Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (2001). The effects of an after‐school
tutoring program on the academic performance of at‐risk students and students with LD.
Remedial and Special Education, 22(3), 172‐186.
Houge, T. T., Geier, C., & Peyton, D. (2008). Targeting adolescents’ literacy skills using one‐to‐one instruction with research‐based practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(8), 640‐ 650.
Koralek, D., & Collins, R. (1997, December). On the Road to Reading: A guide for community partners.
Washington, DC: The Corporation for National Service. Retrieved December 15, 2004, from
Lauer, P. A., Motoko, A., Wilkerson, S. B., Apthorp, H. S., Snow, D., & Martin‐Glenn, M. (2004, January).
The effectiveness of out‐of‐school‐time strategies in assisting low‐achieving students in readingand mathematics: A research synthesis. Aurora, CO: Mid‐continent Research for Education and
Learning. Retrieved on January 7, 2009, from http://www.mcrel.org/topics/products/151/
Madden, N. A., & Slavin, R. E. (1989). Effective pullout programs for students at risk. In R. E. Slavin, N. L.
Karweit, & N. A. Madden (Eds.), Effective programs for students at risk (pp. 52‐72). Boston: Allyn
Maheady, L., Mallette, B., & Harper, G. F. (2006). Four classwide peer tutoring models: Similarities,
differences, and implications for research and practice. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22, 65‐89.
McArthur, D., Stasz, C., & Zmuidzinas, M. (1990). Tutoring techniques in algebra. Cognition and
Instruction, 7(3), 197‐244.
Morris, D., Shaw, B., & Perney, J. (1990, November). Helping low readers in Grades 2 and 3: An afterschool volunteer tutoring program. Elementary School Journal, 91(2), 133‐150
Reisner, E. R., Petry, C. A., & Armitage, M. (1990). A review of programs involving college students as tutors or mentors in grades K‐12. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Robledo, M. Del R. (1990). Partners for valued youth: Dropout prevention strategies for at‐risk language minority students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Schinke, S. P., Cole, K. C., & Poulin, S. R. (2000). Enhancing the education achievement of at‐risk youth. Prevention Science 1(1), 51‐60.
U.S. Department of Education. (2001). Evidence that tutoring works. Washington, DC: Office of the
Deputy Secretary, Planning and Evaluation Service, USDOE.
Warger, C. L. (1991). Peer tutoring: When working together is better than working alone. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
Wasik, B. A., & Slavin, R. E. (1993). Preventing early reading failure with one‐to‐one tutoring: A review of five programs. Reading Research Quarterly 28(2), 178‐200.