Main Article Content
Mozambique, like several other countries in the region and all over the world, faces the dilemma of the need to guarantee the minimum learning conditions for students during the state of emergency due to COVID-19. It is in this sense, which the present study aimed to analyze the perceptions of students of the Pedagogical University of Maputo (UP-Maputo) in the use of electronic platforms as a resource to support classroom teaching during the State of Emergency. The research had a quanti-qualitative character, where the analysis and control of the different variables was foreseen. It consisted of collecting information on the objectives of operationalizing the teaching and learning process in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, through the application of an electronically administered questionnaire. A sample of 1787 students was obtained, corresponding to 13.61% of the universe of students enrolled in the year 2020. The survey showed that most of the students, around 64% used some electronic platform to support their teaching and on-site learning process, after the declaration of a state of emergency the percentage of users of electronic platforms increased to 100%, highlighting the use of WhatsApp to the detriment of the others (SIGIUP, MOODLE® Institutional, Google Classroom and ZOOM®). The device they use, because 95% of the students access the platforms using their mobile phones, justifies the massive use of WhatsApp. Regarding the use of different electronic platforms, most of the students revealed a platform usage that varies from “Many Times” and “Always”. Students refer to the need for training in the use of the different platforms made available to them to support their teaching and learning process. The research made it possible to conclude that students are aware of the need to appropriate the new form of teaching they are subject to, despite having significant financial difficulties in the acquisition of internet packages and in the use of some of the electronic platforms made available for learning.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
A. Carvalho, N. Areal, & J. Silva. Students’ perceptions of Blackboard and Moodle in a Portuguese university. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 824–841, 2011.
R. B. Ceccim, L. M. Feuerwerker. Mudança na Graduação das Profissões de Saúde sob o eixo da integralidade. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro, v. 20, n. 5, p. 1400-1410, set-out. 2004.
D. George, P. Mallery. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 11.0 update, 2003.
L. M. Delgado, C. J. Haguenauer. Uso de Plataforma Moodle no apoio ao Ensino Presencial: um estudo de caso. Revista EducaOnline. ISSN 1983-2664. V.4 nr. 1, p. 11-26, 2010.
P. Freire, Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa. 25. ed. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1996.
H. R. M. Hora, G. T. R. Monteiro, J. Arica. Confiabilidade em Questionários para Qualidade: Um estudo com o Coeficiente Alfa de Cronbach. Produto & Produção, v.11, n.2, p.85-103, 2010.
J. R. Landis, G. G. Koch. The measurement of observer agreement for cat- egorical data. Biometrics. 33:159-74, 1977.
I. C. Laranjeiras, K. S. L. S. Albuquerque & M. G. M. S. Fontes. Methodology of Scientific Research Beyond Academic Life: Assessment of Students and Professionals Formed about their applicability in Professional Life. ReAC – Revista de Administração e Contabilidade. Faculdade Anísio Teixeira (FAT), Feira de Santana-Ba, v. (3), n. (1), p. 19-31, 2011.
W. Lima, P. Cabral, & N. Pedro. E-Learning no Ensino Superior - Satisfação dos estudantes e perspectivas para uma melhor aprendizagem. Indagatio Didactica. ISSN: 1647-3582, vol. 6(1), p. 242-253, 2014.
J. Magano, A. V. Castro, & C. Vaz De Carvalho. O E-learning no Ensino Superior: um caso de estudo. Educação, Formação & Tecnologias, 1(1), 79-92, 2008.
N. Malhotra. Pesquisa de Marketing: uma orientação aplicada. Porto Alegre: Bookman, p.1-719, 2011.
M. A. V. Palácio, M. Struchiner. Análise do uso de recursos de interacção, colaboração e autoria em um ambiente virtual de aprendizagem para o ensino superior na área da saúde. Ciênc. Educ., Bauru, v. 22, n. 2, p. 413-430, 2016.
Plano Estratégico de Educação à Distância (PEED). Estratégia de Educação a distância 2014-2018. Governo de Moçambique. Maputo. 2013.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Final Report. Intergovernmental Conference on Cultural Policies for Development. Stockholm, Sweeden, 1998. UNESCO Doc. CLT-98