The Effect of Learning Method Schoology Applications and Learning Style on Student Learning Outcomes


  • Anna Angela Sitinjak a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:41:"Politeknik Teknologi Kimia Industri Medan";}



Learning Styles, Schoology, Teaching Factory


This type of research is a quasi-experimental research. The purpose of this study is to determine whether student learning outcomes with the LMS method (using Schoology) are higher than conventional and whether there is an interaction between learning methods with student learning styles. The population of this study were all students of the mechanical engineering study program at the PTKI campus Medan. The sampling technique used was cluster random sampling. The control class and experimental class selected each consisted of 20 people. The instrument used to measure students' mathematical achievement is the essay-test. The instrument used to measure student learning styles is a questionnaire. The normality test used is the Lilliefor test and homogeneity test using the Fisher test. Then the ANOVA test was performed with a significance level of 0.05. The results showed that students who were taught using Schoology had high learning outcomes compared to conventional learning and visual learning styles were highest in learning outcomes than other learning styles. But learning styles and learning methods don't have interactions. For further research, it can be done with different learning models and adding other variables to see the readiness of our human resources in facing the industrial world.


Download data is not yet available.


Almrashdeh, I.A., Sahari, N., Zin, N.A.M., & Alsmadi, M. (2011). Distance Learning Management System Requirements from Student’s Perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 24(1), 17-27.

Chryssolouris, G., D. Mavrikios & L. Rentzos. (2016). The Teaching Factory: A Manufacturing Education Paradigm. 49th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, Elsevier,44-48.

DePorter, B and Hernacki. (2011). Quantum Learning (Penerjemaah: Alwiyah Abdurrahman).

Kaifa, Bandung.

Hamzah, B. Uno. (2008). Orientasi Baru dalam Psikologi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Holil, Moh. (2019). Sejarah dan Pendidikan Era Revolusi Industri 4.0.

Murni, Cahyasari kartka & Rina Harimurti. (2016). Pengaruh E-Learning Berbasis Schoology terhadap Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa dalam Materi Perangkat Keras Jaringan Kelas X TKJ 2 pada SMK Negeri 3 Buduran, Sidoarjo. Jurnal IT-Edu. 01(01), 86-90.

Saefuddin, Asis & Ika Berdiati. (2014). Pembelajaran Efektif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sebayang, Rehia. (2018). RI Masuk Daftar Negara Biaya Pendidikan Termahal di Dunia.

Sitinjak, Anna Angela & Esther Nababan. (2017). Efficiency Analysis of Educational Fund Expenditure in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY) and East Java Provinces. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR),6(10),110-115.

Sitinjak, Anna Angela dan Herman Mawengkang. (2018). The Difference Of Students’achievement In Mathematics By Using Guided-Discovery Learning Model AndCooperative Learning Model Jigsaw Type. Infinty Journal, 7(1), 45-54.

Sugihartono, Kartika Nur Fathiyah, Farida Agus Setiawan, Farida Harahap & Siti Rohmah Nurhayat. (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

Suryabrata, Sumadi. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Watson,William R. & Sunnie Lee Watson. (2007). An argument for clarity: what are learning management systems, what are they not, and what should they become?. TechTrends, Springer Verlag, 51(2), 28-34.




How to Cite

Sitinjak, A. A. (2020). The Effect of Learning Method Schoology Applications and Learning Style on Student Learning Outcomes. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 8(6), 113–119.