Main Article Content
This study aims to analysis the relationship between generativity and contribution services. Erikson (1997) pointed out in his Psychosocial Developmental Theory that if an individual was lack of active participation while progressing from stage 7 to stage 8, the individual will tend to be in despair, getting pessimistic. This will eventually cause the individual fail to achieve self-identity. Moreover, Schoklitsch and Baumann (2011) emphasized that generativity is an essential factor to maintain psychological health in old ages. This theory had been approved by Baltes and Baltes (1990) that they regarded generativity and wisdom as the best portrayal of the old age life. It can be seen that generativity is indeed an important study issue in the field of gerontology. In addition, older adults have contributive needs, according to McClusky’s (1971) Margin Theory of Needs. Older adults wanted to give a helping hand to the society. They hoped that both their contribution and themselves will be valued and appreciated. Through their devotion, they wished they could change public’s stereotype of older adults. To be concrete, the purpose of this study is as follows: to understand the relationship between generativity and the contribution of services; to analyze the characteristics, actions and influential factors of generativity; to explore motivations behind, effectiveness of, and influences on the contribution of services. In order to achieve above purposes, this study adopted questionnaire survey method.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
Ackerman, S., Zuroff, D. C. & Moskowitz, D. S., “Generativity in midlife and young adults: links to agency, communion and subjective well-being,” International Journal of Aging and Human Development, vol. 50, 2000, pp. 17-41.
Baltes, P. B. & Baltes, M. M., “Psychological perspectives on successful aging: the model of selective optimization with compensation,” in Successful aging: perspectives from the behavioral sciences (In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes Eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990, pp. 1-34.
Chen Li-Kuang, “The Learning Process of Older Women Participating in Volunteer Service Promote the role of its successful aging,” Taiwanese Gerontological Forum, vol. 10, 2011, pp. 1-25.
Cheng, S. T., “Generativity in later life: perceived respect from younger generations as determinant of goal disengagement and psychological well-being,” Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, vol. 64B, no.1, 2009, pp. 45-54.
Ehlman, K. & Ligon, M., “The application of a generativeity model for older adult,” International Journal of aging and human development, vol. 74, no. 4, 2012, pp. 331-344.
Erikson, E. H., The life cycle completed: extended version with new chapters on the ninth stage of development by Joan M. Erikson. New York: Norton, 1997.
Jones B. K. & McAdams, D. P., “Becoming Generative: Socializing Influences Recalled in Life Stories in Late Midlife,” Journal of Adult Development, vol. 20, no.3, 2013, pp. 158-172.
Keyes, C. L. M. & Ryff, C. D., “Generativity and adult lives: social structural contours and quality life consequences,” In Generativity and adult development: how and why we care for the next generation (D. P. McAdams & E. de St. Aubin Eds.), Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1998, pp. 227-263.
Kotre, J., Outliving the self: generativity and the interpretation of lives, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984.
Kotre, J., Outliving the self: how we live on in future generations, New York: Norton & Co, 1996.
Lamdin, L & Fugate, M., Elder learning: new frontier in an aging society. AZ: The Oryx Press, 1997.
Lin Li-Hui, “The Study of Participating Volunteer Service and Successful Aging of Older Adult,” Journal of Life-and-Death Studies, vol. 4, 2006, pp. 1-36.
Lin, Li-Hui, “Older Adult Education Institutes and Implementation,” In Older Adult Learning (F. S. Huang, Eds.), Taipei: Wu-Nan Book Press, 2008, pp. 161-182.
Lin, Li-Hui, “The social outcomes of older adult learning in Taiwan: evaluation framework and indicators,” Educational Gerontology, vol. 41, no. 4, 2015, pp. 292-304.
McAdams, D. P., & de St. Aubin, E., “A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 62, no.6, 1992, pp. 1003-1015.
McClusky, H. Y., Education: Background and issues. Paper presented at the White House Conference on Aging. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1971.
Ministry of the interior, R. O. C. “Resident Population by Age of 0-14, 15-64, 65+ and by 6-year Age Group.” Monthly Bulletin of Interior Statistics, 2020. Retrieved from https://www.moi.gov.tw/files/site_stuff/321/1/month/month.html
Ranzijn, R., “The potential of older adults to enhance community quality of life: links between positive psychology and productive aging,” Ageing International, vol.27, no.2, 2002, pp. 30-55.
Schoklitsch, A. & Baumann, U., “Measuring generativity in older adults: the development of new scales,” GeroPsych, vol. 24, no. 1, 2011, pp. 31¬-43.
Segal, H. G., DeMeis, D. K., Wood, G. A., & Smith, H. L., “Assessing future possible selves by gender and socioeconomic status using the Anticipated Life History measure,” Journal of Personality, vol. 69, no. 1, 2001, pp. 57-87.
Steward, A. J., & Ostrove, J. M., “ Women’s personality in middle age: Gender, history, and midcourse corrections,” American Psychologist, vol. 53, no. 11, 1998, pp. 1185-1194.
Tang, F., “ Socioeconomic disparities in voluntary organization involvement among older adults,” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 1, 2008, pp. 57-75.
Urrutia, A., Cornachione, M. A., Moisset, G., Ferragut, L. & Guzman, E., “The culminating point of generativity in older women: main aspects of their life narrative,” Forum: Qualitative Social Research, vol. 10, no.3, Art. 1, 2009, Retrieved.from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs090317.
Villar, F. & Celdran, M., “Generativity in older age: a challenge for universities of the third age (U3A),” Educational Gerontology, vol.38, 2012, pp. 666-677.
Villar, F., “Successful ageing and development: The contribution of generativity in older age,” Ageing and society, vol. 32, 2012, pp.1087-1105.
Yuen, H. K., Huang, P., Burik, J. K. & Smith, T. G., “Impact of participating in volunteer activities for residents living in long-term-care facilities,” The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 62, no.1, 2008, pp. 71-77.
Zucker, A. N., Ostrove, J. M., & Stewart, A. J., “ College educated women’s personality development in adulthood: Perceptions and age differences,” Psychology and Aging, vol. 17, no. 2, 2002, pp. 236–244.