Validation of the Garmin Forerunner 920XT VO2max Estimation and the Polar RS300X Fitness Test
Keywords:aerobic capacity, fitness watch, metabolic cart
Several fitness watches have developed tests to estimate VO2max to provide important data and save money by reducing the need for a metabolic cart. Some watches provide results based on heart rate (HR) while others combine HR data with global positioning satellite (GPS) data. The purpose of this study was to validate VO2max from the fitness test on a Garmin Forerunner 920XT (HR and GPS-based) and a Polar RS300X (HR-based) fitness watch against a maximal graded exercise test (GXT) using a metabolic cart.
10 male and 7 female college students (age = 21.5 ± 2.9 years) participated in this study. Session 1 consisted of completing the Informed Consent, PAR-Q, and Garmin fitness test. Session 2 comprised the Polar fitness test and a maximal Bruce treadmill test using the metabolic cart. Maximal performance during the Bruce test was validated by obtaining age-predicted HRmax. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with a significance level of p < 0.05. Secondary analysis was conducted using Pearson correlations.
VO2max from the Garmin, Polar, and metabolic cart tests were 47.82 (± 9.60), 45.53 (± 5.42), and 45.63 (± 8.84) ml/kg/min, respectively. ANOVA tests revealed no significant differences between any of the tests (p = 0.6 between the Garmin and the metabolic cart; p = 0.3 between the Polar and the metabolic cart). Pearson correlations revealed that the Garmin test was highly correlated with r = 0.83 (p < 0.001) while the Polar test was strongly correlated (r = 0.65, p < 0.001).
The findings indicate that Garmin and Polar fitness tests may serve as an adequate substitute for testing using a metabolic cart. The Garmin test may be a more appropriate choice as the correlation was stronger and the Polar test tended to overestimate VO2max.
 Brooks, G. A., Fahey, T. D. & Baldwin, K. M., Basics of metabolism. In Exercise physiology: Human bioenergetics and its application 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 2005, pp. 43-58.
 Cooper, S., Baker, J. S., Tong, R. J., Roberts, E., & Hanford, M., The repeatability and criterion related validity of the 20 m multistage fitness test as a predictor of maximal oxygen uptake in active young men. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2005, 39(4), E19-26.
 Cronk, B. C., Prediction and association. In How to use SPSS: A step-by-step guide to analysis and interpretation 10th ed., Routledge, New York, 2018, pp. 50-64.
 De Alkmim Moreira Nunes, R., De Castro, J. P., De Lima E Silva, L., Da Silva, J. B., De Godoy, E. S., Lima, V. P., & De Souza Vale, R. G., Estimation of specific VO2max for elderly in cycle ergometer. Journal Of Human Sport & Exercise, 2017, 12(4), 1199-1207.
 Drenowatz, C., & Eisenmann, J., Validation of the SenseWear armband at high intensity exercise. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2011, 111(5), 883-887.
 Esco, M. R., Mugu, E. M., Williford, H. N., McHugh, A. N., & Bloomquist, B. E., Cross-validation of the Polar Fitness TestTM via the polar F11 heart rate monitor in predicting VO.sub.2] max. Journal of Exercise Physiology Online, 2011, 14(5), 31-37.
 Hill, A., Long, C., & Lupton, H., Muscular exercise, lactic acid and the supply and utilisation of oxygen. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character, 1924, 97(682), 155-176.
 Ibrahim Aminu, A., & Nuhu Jibril, M., A step test for estimating maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) in male secondary school students. International Journal Of Sports Sciences & Fitness, 2015, 5(1), 42-51.
 ISEEKA, Vo2max accuracy [Web log post]. 2013, December 10, Retrieved from https://forums.garmin.com/showthread.php?66329-Vo2max-accuracy
 Keteyian, S. J., Brawner, C. A., Savage, P. D., Ehrman, J. K., Schairer, J., Divine, G., Ades, P. A.. Peak aerobic capacity predicts prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease. The American Heart Journal, 2008, 156(2), 292-300.
 Mandsager, K., Harb, S., Cremer, P., Phelan, D., Nissen, S. E., & Jaber, W., Association of cardiorespiratory fitness with long-term mortality among adults undergoing exercise treadmill testing. JAMA Network Open, 2018, 1(16), e183605.
 McArdle, W.D., Katch, F. L. and Katch, V. L., Exercise physiology: Nutrition, energy, and human performance (8th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health, Philadelphia, 2015 pp. 177-225.
 Myers, J., Prakash, M., Froelicher, V., Do, D., Partington, S., & Atwood, J., Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. New England Journal Of Medicine, 2002, 436(11), 793-801.
 National Strength & Conditioning Association. In Miller T. (Ed.), NSCA's guide to tests and assessments. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2012 pp. 1-13.
 Neiman, D. C., Cardiorespiratory fitness. In Exercise testing and prescription: A health-related approach (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2011 pp. 42-86.
 Nelson, M. B., Kaminsky, L. A., Dickin, D. C., & Montoye, A. H. K., Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors for specific activity types. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2016, 48(8), 1619–1628.
 Romero-Fallas, O., Soto-Arias, M., & Moncada-Jimenez, J., Maximal oxygen consumption in college students is reliable following four consecutive trials. Journal Of Physical Education & Sport, 2012, 12(4), 476-481.
 Roos, L., Taube, W., Beeler, N., & Wyss, T., Validity of sports watches when estimating energy expenditure during running. BMC Sports Science, Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2017, 9(1), 1–8.
 Salesguy., VO2 Max Estimate from Garmin 520 – good correlation [Web log post]. 2016, January 8, Retrieved from http://forum.slowtwitch.com/forum/Slowtwitch_Forums_C1/Triathlon_Forum_F1/VO2_Max_Estimate_from _Garmin_520_-_good_correlation_P5823259/
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2019 Gina Leigh Kraft, Madeline Dow
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.