Strategy to Improve Quality of Higher Education Institution Based on AUN-QA Standard

Main Article Content

Suwito Eko Pramono
Badingatus Solikhah
Diah Vitri Widayanti
Agung Yulianto


Purpose – The objectives of this research are (1) to describe and analyze the gap between Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES) academic and management resource and ASEAN University Network Quality Assurance (AUN-QA) standard; (2) to describe and analyze the strategy of quality improvement of Universitas Negeri Semarang based on AUN-QA Criteria.

Methodology – This research is conducted with qualitative approach combine with statistical analysis. The respondent in this paper is management positions at UNNES. Data were collected by interview, observation, documents study and questionnaire. Data analysis was performed with interactive analysis model and descriptive statistical analysis.

Findings – The results revealed that the academic and management resources at Semarang State University are good and potential to become a world class university. Quality culture in the implementation of tridharma (education, research and community service) that developed at Semarang State University has been oriented to higher education continuous quality improvement. Therefore, several strategies for improving the quality of higher education that must be implemented in order to achieve AUN-QA certification are: (1) changing mindset and work culture towards international standard, (2) re-structuring of human resource management through education and training, (3) re-structuring of university governance system, (4) strengthening regional and international networking, and (5) strengthening internal controls mechanism.

Significance – These findings can contribute to universities that are preparing to become a world class university to develop a holistic quality assurance system by using the AUN-QA framework reference.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pramono, S. E., Solikhah, B., Widayanti, D. V., & Yulianto, A. (2018). Strategy to Improve Quality of Higher Education Institution Based on AUN-QA Standard. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 6(9), 141-152.
Author Biographies

Suwito Eko Pramono, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

History Department

Badingatus Solikhah, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Accounting Department

Diah Vitri Widayanti, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Foreign Language Department

Agung Yulianto, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Accounting Department


Altbach, P.G. (2003). The Costs and Benefits of World-Class Universities. International Higher Education, 33, pp. 5-8
Altbach, P. & Balan, J. (2007). World class worldwide: Transforming research universities in Asia and Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Arwildayanto. (2010). Management of Human Resources in Higher Education, Lecturer’s Professional Working Culture Approach. Gorontalo: Ideas Publishing.
Adriana T., Reka T.V., Vasile C., Alexandra M. (2008). Implementing the balanced scorecard in public institutions for higher education in Romania—an innovative project. European Journal of Management, Retrieved from : p/articles/mi_6772/is_2_8/ai_n31029532/
Asean University Network. (2016). Guide to AUN-QA Assessment at Program Level V.3.0. ASEAN University Network (AUN). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Auger N., Roy D.A.. (2004). The Balanced Scorecard: A Tool for Health Policy Decision-making. Canadian Journal of Health, vol. 95, No.3, pp. 233-234
Bogt, H.J. & Scapens, R.W. (2009). Performance Measurement in Universities: A Comparative Study of Two A&F Group in the Netherlands and the UK. Paper presented at the 7th ENROAC Conference in Dundee, Scotland, 23-25 June 2009.
Chen S.H., Yang C.C., Shiau J.Y. (2006). The Application Of Balanced Scorecard In The Performance Evaluation Of Higher Education. The TQM Magazine, Vol.18, pp: 190-205
Julnes, P.D.L. & March, H. (2010). Promoting The Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organizations : An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation. Public Administration Review.Vol 61, No. 6.
Ledbetter, R. (2003). Organizational Structure : Influencing Factors and Impact In The Grand Prairie Fire Department. Retrieved from: pdf.
Levin, H.M., Jeong, D.W. and Ou, D. (2006) What is a World Class University?, Paper prepared for presentation at the 2006 Conference on the Comparative and International Education Society, Honolulu, Hawaii, 16 March 2006. Retrieved from: . Accessed 21 May 2016.
Liu, N.C., Wang, Q., Cheng, Y. (2011). Paths to a World-Class University. Rotterdam: The Netherlands, Sense Publishers.
Marginson, S. (2007). Global university rankings: Where to from here?. Paper presented at the Asia-Pacific Association for International Education, Singapore.
Marginson, S. (2007). Global university rankings: Implications in general and for Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol 29 (2), pp131–142.
Marginson, S. (2013). Nation-States, Educational Traditions and the WCU Project in Shin, J, C. and Kehm, B, M. (eds.) Institutionalization of World-Class University in Global Competition, London: Springer, pp. 59-77
Salmi, J. (2009) The Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities, Washington, DC: The World Bank
Silvi, R., Macrì, D.M. & Tagliaventi, M.R. (2004). Performance Measurement Systems: Putting Organizational Effectiveness Ahead. Retrieved from: SSRN: Accessed 20 June 2016.
Simmons, R. (2003) ‘Striving for excellence: How to make a world-class university’, South China Morning Post, p. 15
Spady, W. (1994). Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
Tierney, W.G. and Sirat, M. (2015). Challenges Facing Malaysian. Higher Education. Pp.23-24
Wisniewski, M. and Dickson, A. (2001). Measuring Performance in Dumfries and Galloway Constabulary with the Balanced Scorecard. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 52, No. 10, pp. 1057-1066