Would Criminal Sanctions For Patent Violations Encourage Violators to Respect Intellectual Property Rights?

Main Article Content

Frederick Greene
Linda Naimi

Abstract

This paper analyzes the historical differences between copyrights and patents. Copyright law allows for criminal sanctions for violations. Patent law does not allow for criminal sanctions. The paper looks at this history and poses the question—Why the difference? The paper analyzes these differences and asserts that an imbalance exists between the two types of intellectual property that needs to be adjusted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Greene, F. ., & Naimi, L. . (2018). Would Criminal Sanctions For Patent Violations Encourage Violators to Respect Intellectual Property Rights?. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 6(9), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol6.iss9.1142
Section
Articles

References

Act of January 6, 1897, 54 Cong. Ch. 4, January 6, 1897, 29 Stat. 481

Bloomberg News (2018). https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-25/apple-says-it-

wasn-t-about-money-after-samsung-loses-patent-bet.

CNET. https://www.cnet.com/news/apple-v-samsung-50-suits-10-countries-and-counting/

Cong. Ch. 15, May 31, 1790, 1 Stat. 124)

Copyright Act of 1909, §28, 35 Stat. 1075

Digital Millennium Copyright Act, (1998). 112 Stat. 2860

Dodd-Frank Act, (2010). Pub.L. 111–203

Dubber, M.D. (2013). The Comparative History and Theory of Corporate Criminal Liability,

New Crim. L. Rev 203.

Economic Espionage Act, (1996). Pub. L. 104–294.

Friedrichs, D.O. (2009) Trusted Criminals: white collar crime in contemporary society,4th ed.

Cengage Unlimited Publishing.

Greene, F. (2016) The Path Towards Clear and Convincing Privacy Rights. A dissertation submitted to Purdue University Graduate School. Published by Proquest, LLC. # 10172338. (The current article is taken almost verbatim from selected portions of the 2016 dissertation, with additional commentary and analysis.)

H.R. Rep. No. 93-1581, at 4 (1974) reprinted in 1974 U.S.C.C.A.N. 6849

Leahy-Smith Act, (2011). Pub. L. 112–29.

Mendez, N. (2008). Patent Infringers, Come Out With Your Hands Up! Should the United States

Criminalize Patent Infringement?, 6 Buff. Intell. Prop. L.J. 34.

Mossoff, A. (2007). Who Cares What Thomas Jefferson Thought About Patents? Reevaluating

the Patent “Privilege” in Historical Context, 92 Cor. L. Rev. 953.Patentability and Eligibility, (2017). 35 U.S.C. §101-112

Pub. L. No. 92-140, 85 Stat. 391 (1971)

Pub. L. No. 97-180, 96 Stat. 91 (1982).

Silbey, J. (2008) The Mythical Beginnings of Intellectual Property, 15 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 319

U.S. Patent Act of 1790, 1 Stat. 109.

U.S. Patent Act of 1793, 1 Stat. 318

Walterscheld, E. C. (1997). To Promote the Progress to Useful Arts: American Patent Law and Administration, 1787-1836. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 79 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 61.