Main Article Content
This paper analyzes the historical differences between copyrights and patents. Copyright law allows for criminal sanctions for violations. Patent law does not allow for criminal sanctions. The paper looks at this history and poses the question—Why the difference? The paper analyzes these differences and asserts that an imbalance exists between the two types of intellectual property that needs to be adjusted.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
Act of January 6, 1897, 54 Cong. Ch. 4, January 6, 1897, 29 Stat. 481
Bloomberg News (2018). https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-25/apple-says-it-
Cong. Ch. 15, May 31, 1790, 1 Stat. 124)
Copyright Act of 1909, §28, 35 Stat. 1075
Digital Millennium Copyright Act, (1998). 112 Stat. 2860
Dodd-Frank Act, (2010). Pub.L. 111–203
Dubber, M.D. (2013). The Comparative History and Theory of Corporate Criminal Liability,
New Crim. L. Rev 203.
Economic Espionage Act, (1996). Pub. L. 104–294.
Friedrichs, D.O. (2009) Trusted Criminals: white collar crime in contemporary society,4th ed.
Cengage Unlimited Publishing.
Greene, F. (2016) The Path Towards Clear and Convincing Privacy Rights. A dissertation submitted to Purdue University Graduate School. Published by Proquest, LLC. # 10172338. (The current article is taken almost verbatim from selected portions of the 2016 dissertation, with additional commentary and analysis.)
H.R. Rep. No. 93-1581, at 4 (1974) reprinted in 1974 U.S.C.C.A.N. 6849
Leahy-Smith Act, (2011). Pub. L. 112–29.
Mendez, N. (2008). Patent Infringers, Come Out With Your Hands Up! Should the United States
Criminalize Patent Infringement?, 6 Buff. Intell. Prop. L.J. 34.
Mossoff, A. (2007). Who Cares What Thomas Jefferson Thought About Patents? Reevaluating
the Patent “Privilege” in Historical Context, 92 Cor. L. Rev. 953.Patentability and Eligibility, (2017). 35 U.S.C. §101-112
Pub. L. No. 92-140, 85 Stat. 391 (1971)
Pub. L. No. 97-180, 96 Stat. 91 (1982).
Silbey, J. (2008) The Mythical Beginnings of Intellectual Property, 15 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 319
U.S. Patent Act of 1790, 1 Stat. 109.
U.S. Patent Act of 1793, 1 Stat. 318
Walterscheld, E. C. (1997). To Promote the Progress to Useful Arts: American Patent Law and Administration, 1787-1836. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 79 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 61.