The ROLE OF THE INSTITUTION OF BASHINGANTAHE IN NURTURING GOOD GOVERNANCE AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN BURUNDI GOOD GOVERNANCE AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Main Article Content

Dolive Gretta Kwizera

Abstract

This study on the role of institution of Bashingantahe in nurturing good governance and socio-economic development was carried out in Burundi.  The specific objectives were to assess the roles of institution of Bashingantahe in nurturing good governance and socio-economic development in Burundi before, during and after colonialism; examine the effectiveness of institution of Bashingantahe in nurturing good governance and socio-economic development and to find out the relationship between institution of Bashingantahe and current system of governance in nurturing good governance and socio-economic development.

Article Details

How to Cite
KWIZERA, Dolive Gretta. The ROLE OF THE INSTITUTION OF BASHINGANTAHE IN NURTURING GOOD GOVERNANCE AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN BURUNDI. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 5, p. 151-165, june 2017. ISSN 2411-2933. Available at: <http://ijier.net/index.php/ijier/article/view/706>. Date accessed: 21 aug. 2017.
Section
Articles

References

[1] Commission Nationale Chargée d’Etudier la Question de l’Unité Nationale, Rapport de la Commission Nationale Chargée d’Etudier la Question de l’Unité Nationale (1989); Commission Constitutionnelle, Rapport sur la démocratisation des institutions et de la vie politique au Burundie (Bujumbura: Régie des Productions Pédagogiques, 1991); Burundian constitution of 1992.
[2] Deslaurier, C. (2003). Le bushingantahe au Burundi: De l’institution locale au patrimoine institutionnel national. In Claude-Hélene Perrot and Francois-Xavier Fauvelle- Aymar (ed) Le retour des rois: Les autorite´s traditionnelles et l’e´tat en Afrique contemporaine (pages 401-418). Paris: Karthala.
[3]Durning, A. (1989). Strengthening indigenous institutions. The approaches that work in rural development emerging trends, participatory methods and local initiatives. Muenchan: K.G. Sauer

[4]Kendie, S.B. & Guri, B.Y. (2004).Traditional institutions, culture and development: The Asafo group in the Mankessim-Nkwanta traditionalarea. Cape Coast: Centre for Development Studies, University of CapeCoast, Ghana.

[5]Laely,Thomas, (1992). ‘Le Destin du Bushingantahe: Transformations d’Une Structure Locale d’Autorité au Burundi’, Genève-Afrique 30(2), pp. 75–98.

[6]Nindorera, E.,‘La réconciliation au Burundi, est-elle en marche?’, in Au Coeur de l’Afrique, no.1–2, 2004.

[7]Ntahombaye, Ph. and Manirakiza, Z. (1997), Le rôle des techniques et mécanismes traditionnels dans la résolution pacifique des conflits au Burundi. Bujumbura: UNESCO.

[8]Peter Uvin (2009). Life after Violence: A People’s Story of Burundi. London: Zed Books.

[9]Thomas Laely (1997). ‘Peasants, Local Communities and Central Power in Burundi,’ Journal of Modern African Studies 35(4): 695–716.
UNDP (1997). Governance for sustainable human development . UNDP policydocument. New York.
[10]Uvin P., 2008, Life after violence: A People’s Story of Burundi, London, Zed Books.
[11] Kothari, C.R., 2004. Research methodology; methods and techniques 2nd Edition. New Age International Publishers.
[12]Yamane,T.(1967:886).Retrieved on 10th June2016 from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pd006