Main Article Content
Linguistics courses in universities are largely dependent on lecturing where the professors explain linguistic theories and dry ideas to students. If students are lucky, they may get a chance to do some practice. This often takes the form of exercises or analyses that students prepare at home and discuss in class. Consequently, students consider linguistics courses boring. The paper describes a case study where Blended Learning (BL) techniques are used to enhance the teaching of linguistics. By the end of the course, the success of these techniques is measured through two of the five Sloan-C pillars namely, learning effectiveness and student satisfaction. The findings suggest that BL enriches the teaching and learning environment leading to better results.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
Bennett, N., Dunne, E., & Carre, C. (1998). Patterns of core and generic skills provision in higher education. Higher Education, pp. 71–93.
Biggs, J. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Biggs, J. (1989). Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching. Higher Education Research and Development, pp. 7-25.
Brandl, K. (2005). Are you ready to Moodle? Language Learning and Technology, pp. 16-23.
Carman, J. M. (2005). Blended learning design: Five key ingredients. . Salt Lake City, UT: Agilant Learning.
Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Hounsell, J. (2002). Approaches to study and perceptions of university teaching–learning environments: Concepts, measures and preliminary findings. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
Finn, A. (2002). Trends in e-learning. Retrieved from Learning Circuits: http://www.learningcircuits.org/2002/nov2002/finn.htm
Graham, C. (2005). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. Bonk, & G. C.
R., Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
Graham, C., & Dziuban, C. (2008). Blended Learning Environments. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. van Merrienboer, &
M. Driscoll, The Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology 3rd ed (pp. 269- 276). New York: Routledge.
Graham, C., & Robison, R. (2007). Realizing the Transformational Potential of Blended Learning: Comparing Cases of Transforming Blends and Enhancing Blends in Higher Education. In A. Picciano, & C. Dziuban, Blended Learning: Research Perspectives (pp. 83-110). Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
Johnson, D., & Palmer, C. (2015, September 13). Comparing Student Assessments and Perceptions of Online and Face-to-Face Versions of an Introductory Linguistics Course. Retrieved from Online Learning Journal : http://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/viewFile/449/136
King, S., & Arnold, K. (2012). Blended Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Case Study of How Professors Make it Happen. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, pp. 44-59.
Lopez-Perez, M., Perez-Lopez, M., Rodriguez-Ariza, L., & Argente-Linares, E. (2013). The influence of the use of technology on student outcomes in a blended learning context. Education Technology and Research Development, pp. 625–638.
Lorenzo, G., & Moore, J. (2002, November). The Sloan Consortium Report to the Nation Five Pillars of Quality Online Education. Retrieved December 21, 2014, from http://www.edtechpolicy.org/ArchivedWebsites/Articles/FivePillarsOnlineEducation.pdf
Macdonald, J. (2008). Blended Learning and Online Tutoring. Abingdon: Gower Publishing Limited.
Moodle statistics. (2015, September 11). Retrieved from Moodle.net: https://moodle.net/stats/
Picciano, A. G. (2007). Introduction. In A. Picciano, & C. Dziuban, Blended Learning: Research Perspectives (pp. 5-18). Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
Poon, J. (2013). Blended Learning: An Institutional Approach for Enhancing Students' Learning Experiences. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 271-289.
Schacter, J. (1999). JohnThe Impact of Education Technology on Student Achievement:What the Most Current Research Has To Say. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Education Technology.
Vignare, K. (2007). Review of Literature Blended Learning: Using ALN to Change the Classroom—Will it Work? In
A. G. Picciano, & C. D. Dziuban (Eds.), Blended Learning: Research Perspectives (pp. 37-64). Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 5-23.