Main Article Content
Reading is one of the most important skills that need to be acquired. Due to this the Malaysian government implemented the LINUS programme in school to help pupils master the basic skill involved English. The problems for most LINUS pupils come after they pass their LINUS screening. They were not able to read most materials in the text and read with difficulty. It is hoped that by finding the readability level of the texts in the textbook and the LINUS screening it will shed a light on how teacher could handle the problems. For this study 6 texts; 3 from each the Textbook and LINUS screening respectively was chosen randomly. The texts were calculated using the SMOG, FOG, Flesch-Kincaid and Spache formula to obtain their readability level. Spearman correlation test was conducted to see the consistency between the readability formulas in predicting the difficulty level. It is found that the texts in the textbook is more difficult compared to the LINUS texts.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
Dale, E., & Chall, J. S. (1949). The concept of readability. Elementary English, 26, 19-26.
Janan, D & Wray D (2014). Reassessing the accuracy and use of readability formula. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, Vol 11, 127- 145
Kim Y. & Ma J.H. (2012). Text Readability of the College Scholastic Ability Test and High School English II Textbooks. English Teaching, Vol. 67 (4), 195 – 218
Klare, G. R. (1963). The measurement of readability. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
Lee, Yu-Min. (2008). A comparative analysis of readability in the English textbooks and nationwide achievement test for first-year High School students. Hanyang University, Seoul
Mirshojaee, S. B. & Sahragard, R. (2015). Reading comprehension passages of Iranian general English books and MA. English Language Teaching, 2(2), 77-98. Nation
Owu-Ewie,. (2014). Readability of comprehension passages in junior high school (JHS) English textbooks in Ghana. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 35-68
Park, N. S. (1977) Variables in sentential readability with special reference to EFL/EFL for Korean learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, 1. Washington D.C.
Varzaneh M.M & Darani L.H(2018). EFL Textbook Evaluation: An Analysis of Readability and Vocabulary Profiler of Four Corners Book Series International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research , 6(22), 47-57
Yunus M.M & Chun J. Z. (2016). Teachers’ Perspective on the Reading Behaviour of Primary ESL Learners in SJKC Chung Hua Semera Sarawak. International Seminar on Generating Knowledge Through Research. Proceeding of ICECRS, (1) 493-498