Estimating, Budgeting for Quality Control in Higher Education

Main Article Content

Safar Bakheet Almudara


The current study aims to determine the attitudes of estimate and budget of quality control for higher education for the universities and affiliated its institutions. Who is presently undergoing quality assessment according to the National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment (NCAAA), it is the organization responsible for verifying quality documents which are prepared by the respective universities and its affiliated colleges and institutions to meet its goals. So in this article suggest the most suitable techniques to estimate and budget for the quality control. To determine most suitable estimate method, this paper analyzes various methods and selects a suitable method of the cost estimate. According to results, the attitudes of the cost estimate depends on the quality work break structure and its various levels of work done to achieve intended goals. The case research examined in this paper was carried out by the authors of the research project ‘Factors Affecting the Quality control in higher education: an Empirical Investigation around Saudi Arabian Universities.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Almudara, S. (2018). Estimating, Budgeting for Quality Control in Higher Education. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 6(1), 1-10. Retrieved from


Carpenter, B., Ashdown, R., & Bovair, K. (Eds.). (2017). Enabling access: Effective teaching and learning for pupils with learning difficulties. Routledge.
Davis, H. C., Dickens, K., Leon Urrutia, M., Vera, S., del Mar, M., & White, S. (2014). MOOCs for Universities and Learners an analysis of motivating factors.
Delamonica, E., Mehrotra, S., & Vandemoortele, J. (2001). Education for all is affordable: a minimum global cost estimate. New York: UNICEF.
Deininger, K. (2003). Does cost of schooling affect enrollment by the poor? Universal primary education in Uganda. Economics of Education review, 22(3), 291-305.
Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., Brewer, P. C., & McGowan, A. (2010). Managerial accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(4), 792-793.
Haugan, G. T. (2002). Effective work breakdown structures. Management Concepts Inc.
Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education (Vol. 46). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Margavio, G. W., Fink, R. L., & Margavio, T. M. (1994). Quality improvement using capital budgeting and Taguchi’s function. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 11(6), 10-20.
Owlia, M. S., & Aspinwall, E. M. (1996). A framework for the dimensions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 4(2), 12-20.
Winn, B. A., & Cameron, K. S. (1998). Organizational quality: An examination of the Malcolm Baldrige national quality framework. Research in Higher Education, 39(5), 491-512.