Main Article Content
Executive coaching is now becoming paramount in any organization that values performance. However, there is scanty research on the relationship between executive coaching and organizational performance. The purpose of this study is to identify the contextual, theoretical, conceptual and methodological gaps that exist between executive coaching and organizational performance. The study has found out that relatively few theories link the two major variables in the study. Experiential leaning theory talks about learning experiences and outcomes of executives but fails to give a clear link of how the various outcomes lead to organizational performance. More so, cognitive behavior theory is more inclined to behavioral changes and self-driven scrutiny on finding fault in oneself with aid of Socratic questioning, but does not clearly explain how the changes lead to organizational performance. The systems approach sheds light on how the various systems in the organization can be amalgamated to give an effective leader but fails to indicate how effective leadership translates to organizational performance. The goal theory on the other hand explains how the various environment and personal aspects lead to goal attainment in the organization. However, learning and behavior change have not been used categorically to explain the goal attainment process. The empirical studies conducted tend to relate executive coaching to other variables such as job satisfaction, individual commitment, self-efficacy and self awareness in the western context but fails to associate the coaching exercise to organizational performance. Finally, few studies have employed inferential statistics to show the association between executive coaching and organizational performance. The fundamental conclusion therefore, is that the gaps mentioned and explained in this study need to be addressed in order to show if indeed there is any association. The study would help organizations in realizing that, the association between executive coaching and organizational performance has an impact in the firm.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
Ashford, S. J. (1986). Feedback seeking in individual adaptation; A resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29 (1), 465-487.
Axmith, M (2004). Executive coaching: A catalyst for personal growth and corporate change. Ivey Business Journal, 1–5.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Berger, J. G. (2006). Adult Development Theory and Executive Coaching practice. In Evidence based coaching handbook: Putting best practices to work for your clients, pages 77-102.
Berglas, S.(2002).The very real dangers of executive coaching. Harvard Business Review, 80: 86-93.
Bolch, M. (2001). Proactive Coaching. Training, 38: 58-63.
Brockbank, A. and McGill, I (2006). Facilitating Reflective Learning Through Mentoring and Coaching. London.
Brooks, I., & Wright, S. (2007). A survey of executive coaching practices in New Zealand. International Journal of Evidence based Coaching and Mentoring, 5(1), 30-41
Brotman, L.E., Liberi, W.P., & Wasylyshyn, K.M. (2007). Executive coaching: The need for standards of competence. In R.R Kilburg & R.C. Diedrich (Eds.), The wisdom of coaching: Essential papers in consulting psychology for a world of change. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Conner, M. and Pokora, J. (2007). Coaching and mentoring at work: developing effective practice.
Dagley, G. (2006). Human resource professionals’ perceptions of executive coaching: Efficacy, benefits and return on investment. International Coaching Psychology Review, 1(2), 34-45.
Ducharme, M. J. (2004). The Cognitive-behavioral Approach to executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research , 56 (4), 214-224
Evers, W.J.G., Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2006). A quasi-experimental study on management coaching effectiveness. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 58(3), 174-182.
Good, D., Yeganeh, B. & Yeganeh, R. (2010). Cognitive behavioral executive coaching. Od practitioner, 42 (3).
Grant, A. M., Franklin, J., & Langford, P. (2002). The self-reflection and insight scale: A new measure of private self-consciousness. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 30(8), 821.
Grant, A. M., & Zackon, R. (2004). Executive, workplace and life coaching: Findings from a large-scale survey of International Coach Federation members. International Journal of Evidence based Coaching and Mentoring, 2(2), 1-15.
Hall, D. T., Otazo, K. L., & Hollenbeck, G. P. 1999. Behind closed doors: What really happens in executive coaching. Organizational Dynamics, 27: 39-53.
Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. 1994. What we know about leadership effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49: 493-504.
Holman, D., Pavlica, K., & Thorpe, R. (1997). Rethinking Kolb's theory of experiential learning in management education: The contribution of social constructionism and activity theory. Management Learning, 28( 2), 135-148.
Hopkins, R. (1993). David Kolb’s experiential learning-machine. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 24:(1), 46-62.
Kampa-Kokesch, S, & White, R.P. (2002). The effectiveness of executive coaching: What we know and what we still need to know. In R.L. Lowman (Ed.), The handbook of organizational consulting psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Killburg, R.R. (2007a). Toward a conceptual understanding and definition of executive coaching. In R.R Kilburg & R.C. Diedrich (Eds.), The wisdom of coaching: Essential papers in consulting psychology for a world of change (pp. 21-30). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Luthans, F., & Peterson, S. (2003). 360-degree feedback with systematic coaching: Empirical analysis suggests a winning combination. Human Resource Management, 42 (3), 243-256.
Lynham, S. A. (2000). Theory building in the human resource development profession. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11 (2), 159-178.
Mesterova, J., Prochazka, J., & Vaculik, M. (2014) Relationship between self-efficacy, transformational leadership and leader effectiveness. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 3(2), 109-122.
Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5-15
Moen, F., & Allgood, E. (2009). Coaching and the effect on self-efficacy. Organization Development Journal, 27(4), 69-82.
Moen, F., & Federici, R. A. (2012). Perceived leadership self-efficacy and coach competence: Assessing a coaching-based leadership self-efficacy scale. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring, 10(2), 1-16.
Mugenda, O. M. and Mugenda, A. G. (1999). Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Nairobi: Acts Press.
Neenan, M. (2008). From cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) to cognitive behavior coaching (CBC). Journal of Rational-Emotive Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 26:(1), 3-15
Neenan, M. (2009). Using Socratic questioning in coaching. Journal of Rational-Emotive Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 27: (4), 249-264
Peterson, D. B. (2007) Executive coaching in a cross-cultural context. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 59, 261-271.
Pryor, K.W., Haag, R. and O’Reilly, J. (1969), “The creative porpoise: training for novel behaviour”, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 653-61.
Ray, W.A. (2007), “Bateson’s cybernetics: the basis of MRI brief therapy: prologue”, Kybernetes, Vol. 36 Nos 7/8, pp. 859-70.
Shumway, S.T., Kimball, T.G., Korinek, A.W. and Arredondo, R. (2007), “A family systems-based model of organizational intervention”, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 134-48.
Smither, J. W., London, M., Flautt, R., Vargas, Y., & Kucine, I. (2003). Can working with an executive coach improve multisource feedback ratings over time? A quasi-experimental field study. Personnel Psychology, 56 (1), 23-44.
Wasylyshyn, K. M. (2003). Executive coaching: An outcome study. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice & Research, 55(2), 94-106.
Wood, R. E. (1986). Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 60–82.
Wood, R. E., & Locke, E. A. (1990). Goal setting and strategy effects on complex tasks. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 73–109). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Wood, R. E., Mento, A. J., & Locke, E. A. (1990). Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 416425.
Vince, R. (1998). Behind and beyond Kolb’s learning Cycle. Journal of Management Education, 22(3), 304-319.