New Online Teaching Mode of Higher Education with Information Technology

Main Article Content

Xin-Hong Wang Jing-Ping Wang

Abstract

In this article, the current situation of online teaching of higher education in the information age was briefly described, and the characteristics of MOOC and SPOC was also analyzed and compared to propose and construct a new mode of post-MOOC online education based on "autonomous learning - collaborative learning – mixed learning and learning "SCH-SPOC teaching model; and taking the teaching of engineering graphics course exploration as an example, demonstrated the resource-sharing individualized learning mode, while co-teaching collaborative learning mode and flip classroom mixed learning The significance of the new model is to gradually break the traditional pattern of "full house".

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wang, X.-H., & Wang, J.-P. (2017). New Online Teaching Mode of Higher Education with Information Technology. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 5(11), 17-27. Retrieved from http://ijier.net/ijier/article/view/801
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Jing-Ping Wang, Yancheng Teachers University, China

School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering

References

[1] Spyropoulou N, Demopoulou G, Pierrakeas C, Koutsonikos I, Kameas A. Developing a Computer Programming MOOC. Procedia Computer Science 2015;65:182-91.
[2] Baturay MH. An Overview of the World of MOOCs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2015;174:427-33.
[3] Ma J, Zheng J, Zhao G. The Applicable Strategy for the Courses Alliance in Regional Universities Based on MOOC Platform. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2015;176:162-6.
[4] Zhuhadar L, Kruk SR, Daday J. Semantically enriched Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) platform. Computers in Human Behavior 2015;51:578-93.
[5] Xing W, Chen X, Stein J, Marcinkowski M. Temporal predication of dropouts in MOOCs: Reaching the low hanging fruit through stacking generalization. Computers in Human Behavior 2016;58:119-29.
[6] Pucciarelli F, Kaplan A. Competition and strategy in higher education: Managing complexity and uncertainty. Business Horizons 2016;59:311-20.
[7] Glebova I, Yasnitskaya Y, Maklakova N. The Evaluation of the Innovative Activity of Modern Russia's Higher Educational Establishments and Ways of its Fostering. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2015;191:2374-81.
[8] Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster. Business Horizons 2016;59:441-50.
[9] O'Flaherty J, Phillips C. The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education 2015;25:85-95.
[10] Evseeva A, Solozhenko A. Use of Flipped Classroom Technology in Language Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2015;206:205-9.
[11] Betihavas V, Bridgman H, Kornhaber R, Cross M. The evidence for 'flipping out': A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse Educ Today 2016;38:15-21.
[12] Hao Y. Exploring undergraduates' perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their flipped classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior 2016;59:82-92.
[13] Nishigawa K, Omoto K, Hayama R, Okura K, Tajima T, Suzuki Y, Hosoki M, Shigemoto S, Ueda M, Rodis OM, Matsuka Y. Comparison between flipped classroom and team-based learning in fixed prosthodontic education. J Prosthodont Res 2016.