Purpose of the use of technologies in the contemporary models of Corporate University

Main Article Content

Solange Maria da Silva, PhD
Gertrudes A. Dandolini, PhD
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0867-9495
Patricia de Sá Freire, PhD
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9259-682X
João Artur de Souza, PhD
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7133-8944
Willian Rochadel
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3772-8391
Aline de Brittos Valdati
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6407-8689

Abstract

This paper aims to identify the purpose of the use of technologies in the contemporary models of corporate university: Stakeholder University (SU) and Networked Corporate University (NCU). To accomplish it, we carried out a systematic search in the main electronic bases of scientific documents, categorizing the studies by means of the revised Bloom's Taxonomy. This search enabled to distinguish the purpose of the use of technologies in corporate universities, such as the purpose of integration between different stakeholders in relation to knowledge. The research highlights the Corporate University in addition to an environment of education; but an area of innovation in which the integration of stakeholders, university and organization constitutes an important interaction and sharing networks. By identifying the technological characteristics and tools, it points out new approaches of technological integration in the mediation between stakeholders in order to promote networked learning. That is, to remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate, and create (Bloom's Taxonomy), but, especially, to generate value from these relationships. The conclusion is that the distance education technologies, the knowledge media, and the engineering and knowledge management tools arise as enablers of the purpose of creating technologies to generate shared knowledge and stakeholder interaction, according to the models of SU and NCU.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Maria da Silva, S., A. Dandolini, G., de Sá Freire, P., Artur de Souza, J., Rochadel, W., & de Brittos Valdati, A. (2018). Purpose of the use of technologies in the contemporary models of Corporate University. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 6(8), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.Vol6.Iss8.1117
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Gertrudes A. Dandolini, PhD, Federal University of Santa Catarina

Master (1997) and PhD in Production Engineering from the Federal University of Santa Catarina (2000), and a degree in Mathematics from the Federal University of Santa Catarina (1992). She was a professor at the Federal University of Pelotas between 2003 and 2007, where she coordinated the Mathematics course and the Mathematics course in distance learning. She is a researcher at the Open University of Brazil (UAB) until 2011. She is currently a Full Professor at the Federal University of Santa Catarina, Department of Knowledge Engineering, one of the leaders of IGTI Research Group and ENGIN - Integration and Knowledge Governance Engineering. In the undergraduate has worked with the subject of General Theory of Systems, Creativity and Innovation and Management of Innovation. In postgraduate studies she is a professor of the Graduate Program in Engineering and Knowledge Management at UFSC in the area of ​​innovation. Research area mainly works with: Front End of Innovation, Intelligence for Innovation, Management of Innovation, Social Innovation and Corporate University.

Willian Rochadel, Federal University of Santa Catarina

PhD student at Postgraduate Program in Knowledge Engineering and Management (PPGEGC) of the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Master's degree in Knowledge Engineering (PPGEGC/UFSC), Graduated in Information & Communication Technologies (UFSC). He is currently Administrative Staff in IT Technician at UFSC and Researcher at the RexLab (Remote Experimentation Lab) and IGTI (Intelligence, Management and Technology for Innovation).

Aline de Brittos Valdati, Federal University of Santa Catarina

PhD Student

References

Allaho, M. Y., & Lee, W. C. (2014). Trends and behavior of developers in open collaborative software projects. Paper presented at the 2014. 1st IEEE International Conference on Behavioral, Economic, Socio-Cultural Computing, BESC 2014.
Allen, M. (2002). The corporate university handbook: Designing, managing, and growing a successful program: AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives: Allyn & Bacon.
Antonelli, G., Cappiello, G., & Pedrini, G. (2013). The Corporate University in the European utility industries. Utilities Policy, 25, 33-41. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2013.02.003
Beyea, S. C., & Nicoll, L. H. (1998). Writing an integrative review. AORN J. Apr; 67(4).
Boyce, G. (2004). Critical accounting education: Teaching and learning outside the circle. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(4-5), 565-586. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-2942659525&partnerID=40&md5=6f9252a8c7af5ce89be5e53afefc180c
Buchbinder, H. (1993). The market oriented university and the changing role of knowledge. Higher Education, 26(3), 331-347. doi:10.1007/BF01383490
Caetano, S. S., Ferreira, D. J., Camilo-Junior, C. G., & Ullmann, M. R. D. (2015). A hybrid genetic algorithm for group formation at workplace. Paper presented at the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2015.
Camelo, C., Trigo, M. R., Quoniam, L., & Cardoso, J. C. (2013). Competitive Intelligence and the Development of Corporate Universities. Competitive Intelligence and Decision Problems (pp. 281-298): John Wiley and Sons.
Castree, N. (1999). 'Out there'? 'in here'? Domesticating critical geography. Area, 31(1), 81-86. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0033041157&partnerID=40&md5=d77a303fb078892cdf990e8d6b7fec07
Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). A knowledge engineering approach to developing mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 54(1), 289-297. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.023
Cifuentes, G. (2016). Conceptualizando prácticas de liderazgo de las TIC: Un estudio en la educación superior colombiana. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, aape epaa, 24 (100). http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2535
Clinton, M. S., Merritt, K. L., & Murray, S. R. (2009). Using corporate universities to facilitate knowledge transfer and achieve competitive advantage: An exploratory model based on media richness and type of knowledge to be transferred. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(4), 43-59. doi:10.4018/jkm.2009062903
Cranch, E. T. (1987). Corporate Classrooms. Paper presented at the 1987 Proceedings - Fourth International IEEE VLSI Multilevel Interconnection Conference., New York, NY, USA
Crocetti, C. (2001). Corporate learning - A knowledge management perspective. Internet and Higher Education, 4(3-4), 271-285. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-23644438908&partnerID=40&md5=f0802960cee8d9060ca114102f594a28
Crossan, m. M., Jane, h. W. & White, r. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522-537.Dealtry, R. (2005). Achieving integrated performance management with the corporate university. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(1-2), 65-78. doi:10.1108/13665620510574469
Dealtry, R., & Rademakers, M. (2005). Corporate universities: driving force of knowledge innovation. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(1/2), 130-136.
Dealtry, R., & Settle, D. (2005). Integrating programme and process performance QA. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(4), 255-267. doi:10.1108/13665620510597202
Durkin, J., & Durkin, J. (1998). Expert Systems: Design and Development: Prentice Hall PTR.
EBOLI, M. (2010). Fundamentos e evolução da educação corporativa. EBOLI, Marisa et al. Educação Corporativa: fundamentos, evolução e implantação de projetos. São Paulo: Atlas, 140-161.
Elia, G., & Poce, A. (2010). Future trends for i-learning experiences Open Networked "i-Learning": Models and Cases of "Next-Gen" Learning (pp. 133-157): Springer US.
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB journal, 22(2), 338-342.
Farias, V., Oliveira, J., & Souza, J. (2009). Knowledge management integrating organizational learning in a military context: The 3M model. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 9(1), 111-123. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77749340978&partnerID=40&md5=cf49475a64d2e3507e24335f9704c0ba
Freire, P. S., Dandolini, G. A., Souza, J. A., Trierweiller, A. C., Silva, S. M., Sell, D., & Steil, A. V. (2016a). Corporate university network: Initial considerations for a new model of corporate education. Espacios, 37(5), 1-1. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84964715461&partnerID=40&md5=de7b969adbb3ad6b8677cc8bc9a38f8e
Freire, P. S., Dandolini, G. A., Souza, J. A., & Silva, S. M. (2016b). Processo de implantação da Universidade Corporativa em Rede (UCR). Espacios, Caracas, 37(23), pp.1-22. Retrieved from http://www.revistaespacios.com/a16v37n23/163723e2.html
Freire, P. S., Dandolini, G. A., & de Souza, J. A. (2017a). Implementation Process of Corporate University in Network (CUN). International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 5(12), 101-126.
Freire, P. S.; Dandolini, G. A. ; Souza, J. A. ; Silva, S. M. (2017b). Corporative University in Network: initial considerations towards a new model of corporate education. International Journal of Development Research, v. 7, p. 17207-17216.
Freund, A., & Mustaro, P. N. (2016), Phabrika: Teaching financial techniques to sell through serious game. Vol. 445. World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, WorldCIST 2016 (pp. 199-208): Springer Verlag.
Fu, Q.-K., & Hwang, G.-J. (2018). Trends in mobile technology-supported collaborative learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2016. Computers & Education, 119, 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.004.
Giroto, C. R. M., Poker, R. B., & Omote, S. (2012). As tecnologias nas práticas pedagógicas inclusivas. Marília: Cultura Acadêmica. Retrieved from https://www.marilia.unesp.br/Home/Publicacoes/as-tecnologias-nas-praticas_e-book.pdf
Grey, C. (2001). Re-imagining Relevance: A Response to Starkey and Madan. British Journal of Management, 12(SPEC. ISS.), S27-S32. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0035731957&partnerID=40&md5=6aa6b358ce05af80f20ca16e6222b8df
Huijun, N., & Fusheng, W. (2011). Development model choice and strategy interaction in Corporate Universities. Paper presented at the 2011 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Communication Software and Networks, ICCSN 2011, Xi'an.
Jansink, F., Kwakman, K., & Streumer, J. (2005). The knowledge-productive corporate university. Journal of European Industrial Training, 29(1 SPEC. ISS.), 40-57. doi:10.1108/03090590510576208
Keskin, N. O., & Metcalf, D. (2011). The current perspectives, theories and practices of mobile learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 202-208. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79955162378&partnerID=40&md5=671203b03173923786f16cca20a17116
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Knowles, M. S. (1973, 1990). Do aluno adulto: uma espécie negligenciada. 4ª ed. Houston: Gulf Publishing.
Lawrence, S., & Sharma, U. (2002). Commodification of education and academic labour - Using the balanced scorecard in a university setting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(5-6), 661-677. doi:10.1006/cpac.2002.0562
Lui Abel, A., & Li, J. (2012). Exploring the corporate university phenomenon: Development and implementation of a comprehensive survey. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 23(1), 103-128.
Macpherson, A., Homan, G., & Wilkinson, K. (2005). The implementation and use of e-learning in the corporate university. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(1-2), 33-48. doi:10.1108/13665620510574441
Margherita, A., & Secundo, G. (2009). The Emergence of the Stakeholder University Open Business Innovation Leadership: The Emergence of the Stakeholder University (pp. 170-207). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Margherita A., & Secundo G. (2011) The stakeholder university as learning model of the extended enterprise, Journal of Management Development, 30(2): 175-186.
Martin, F. (2011). Lafarge develops employee talent through e-learning. Industrial and Commercial Training, 43(5), 291-296. doi:10.1108/00197851111145880
Meister, J. (1998). Corporate universities: Lessons in building a world-class work force: McGraw-Hill Education.
Narasimharao, B. P. (2009). Knowledge economy and knowledge society - Role of University outreach programmes in India. Science, Technology and Society, 14(1), 119-151. doi:10.1177/097172180801400105
Pacheco, R. C. d. S., Sell, D., Steil, A. V., Ceci, F., Fernandes, V., & Andreoli, C. V. (2015). The Sanitary and Environmental Engineering Journal in the Brazilian Science, Technology and Innovation System. Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental, 20(1), 1-16.
Romano, A., & Secundo, G. (2009). Dynamic learning networks: Models and cases in action: Springer US.
Rowlinson, M., Booth, C., Clark, P., Delahaye, A., & Procter, S. (2009). Social remembering and organizational memory. Organization Studies.
Schreiber, G. (2000). Knowledge engineering and management: the CommonKADS methodology: MIT press.
Selby, L., & Russell, D. (2005). Curriculum design and management in the Digital Media U. Applying the corporate university concept to a business sub-sector. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(1-2), 24-32. doi:10.1108/13665620510574432
Smith, E. A. (2005). Communities of Competence: New resources in the workplace. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(1-2), 7-23. doi:10.1108/13665620510574423
Spitzer-Hanks, D. T. (2016). Process-model feminism in the Corporate University. Gender and Education, 1-15. doi:10.1080/09540253.2016.1166180
Studer, R., Decker, S., Fensel, D., & Staab, S. (2004). Situation and perspective of knowledge engineering. Knowledge Engineering and Agent Technology, 52, 237.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2007). A formação social da mente. 7. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
Yeh, Y.-c., Huang, L.-y., & Yeh, Y.-l. (2011). Knowledge management in blended learning: Effects on professional development in creativity instruction. Computers & Education, 56(1), 146-156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.011
Zachry, M., Cook, K. C., Faber, B. D., & Clark, D. (2001). The changing face of technical communication: New directions for the field in a new millennium. Paper presented at the SIGDOC 2001: Special Interest Group for Documentation Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation Communication in the New Millenium, Santa Fe, NM.
Zammuto, R. F. (2008). Accreditation and the globalization of business. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7(2), 256-268. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-61849155755&partnerID=40&md5=f25591fdccd792e94d9b579e666fca50
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2005). A model of values and actions for personal knowledge management. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(1-2), 49-64. doi:10.1108/13665620510574450